PCP Considerations for WebRTC Usage

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2013-11-25 (latest revision 2013-05-24)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at


This document describes the motivations for WebRTC applications to be PCP-aware and the benefits provided by PCP-capable NATs and Firewalls.


Reinaldo Penno (repenno@cisco.com)
Tirumaleswar Reddy.K (tireddy@cisco.com)
Dan Wing (dwing@cisco.com)
Mohamed Boucadair (mohamed.boucadair@orange.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)