Differentiated Services Delay-and-Loss vs. Loss-Rate-Adaptive Service Classes
draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | James Polk , Toerless Eckert | ||
| Last updated | 2014-01-16 (Latest revision 2013-07-15) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses how RTCWeb/RMCAT applications could best leverage existing and new DiffServ assignments and why we think it is necessary to differentiate the assignments of delay-and-loss- based vs. just-loss-based rate-adaptive video applications.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)