Methodology for Benchmarking SIP Networking Devices
draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Scott Poretsky , Vijay K. Gurbani , Carol Davids | ||
| Last updated | 2009-04-29 (Latest revision 2007-11-19) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the methodology for benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) performance as described in Terminology document [5]. The methodology and terminology are to be used for benchmarking signaling plane performance with varying signaling and media load. Both scale and establishment rate are measured by signaling plane performance. The SIP Devices to be benchmarked may be a single device under test (DUT) or a system under test (SUT). Benchmarks can be obtained and compared for different types of devices such as SIP Proxy Server, SBC, P-CSCF, and Server paired with a Firewall/NAT device.
Authors
Scott Poretsky
Vijay K. Gurbani
Carol Davids
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)