The Additional Section and Glue in DNS Responses
draft-pp-additional-contents-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Paul E. Hoffman , Peter van Dijk | ||
| Last updated | 2022-06-16 (Latest revision 2021-12-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Implementers have recently expressed different views on what can appear in the Additional section in DNS responses. Proposals for adding functionality to the DNS protocol that rely on non-glue records in the Additional section rely on having a common understanding of the semantics of the Additional section. This document restates what has been said in other DNS standards, and does not update any of them.
Authors
Paul E. Hoffman
Peter van Dijk
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)