Advertising Segment Routing Policies in BGP
draft-previdi-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-06
|
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (idr WG)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2017-06-16
(latest revision 2017-06-15)
|
|
Replaces |
|
draft-sreekantiah-idr-segment-routing-te
|
|
Stream |
|
IETF
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
Candidate for WG Adoption
Other - see Comment Log
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
No shepherd assigned
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
Network Working Group S. Previdi, Ed.
Internet-Draft C. Filsfils
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: December 17, 2017 P. Mattes
Microsoft
E. Rosen
Juniper Networks
S. Lin
Google
June 15, 2017
Advertising Segment Routing Policies in BGP
draft-previdi-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-06
Abstract
This document defines a new BGP SAFI with a new NLRI in order to
advertise a candidate path of a Segment Routing Policy (SR Policy).
An SR Policy is a set of candidate paths consisting of one or more
segment lists. The headend of an SR Policy may learn multiple
candidate paths for an SR Policy. Candidate paths may be learned via
a number of different mechanisms, e.g., CLI, NetConf, PCEP, or BGP.
This document specifies the way in which BGP may be used to
distribute candidate paths. New sub-TLVs for the Tunnel
Encapsulation Attribute are defined.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 17, 2017.
Previdi, et al. Expires December 17, 2017 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Segment Routing Policies in BGP June 2017
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. SR TE Policy Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1. SR TE Policy SAFI and NLRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. SR TE Policy and Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute . . . . . 7
2.3. Remote Endpoint and Color . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4. SR TE Policy Sub-TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4.1. Preference sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4.2. SR TE Binding SID Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4.3. Segment List Sub-TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. Extended Color Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4. SR Policy Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.1. Configuration and Advertisement of SR TE Policies . . . . 22
4.2. Reception of an SR Policy NLRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.2.1. Acceptance of an SR Policy NLRI . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.2.2. Usable SR Policy NLRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.2.3. Passing a usable SR Policy NLRI to the SRTE Process . 24
4.2.4. Propagation of an SR Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4.3. Flowspec and SR Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8.1. Existing Registry: Subsequent Address Family Identifiers
(SAFI) Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Show full document text