IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing
draft-previdi-isis-segment-routing-extensions-05
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(isis WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Stefano Previdi , Clarence Filsfils , Ahmed Bashandy , Hannes Gredler , Stephane Litkowski , Jeff Tantsura | ||
| Last updated | 2014-08-17 (Latest revision 2014-02-13) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8667 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This draft describes the necessary IS-IS extensions that need to be introduced for Segment Routing.
Authors
Stefano Previdi
Clarence Filsfils
Ahmed Bashandy
Hannes Gredler
Stephane Litkowski
Jeff Tantsura
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)