Registration Procedures for Private Enterprise Numbers (PENs)
draft-pti-pen-registration-10
Yes
Éric Vyncke
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Robert Wilton)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Erik Kline)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -09)
Not sent
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2022-12-13 for -09)
Sent
Two minor comments: The document mentions https://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers but that is not a clickable link. Is this by design? It is not even a document reference where in the reference there is a link. This document requires two changes to the PEN registry. Should this be "requests" instead of "requires" ? Even though I guess it is a little odd that IANA requests IANA to do something :)
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -09)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2022-12-14 for -09)
Sent
No references are listed as Normative. I find this hard to believe, given the characterization described here [1]. Please review the references and move the ones that "must be read to understand...the new RFC" to be Normative. For example, rfc8126 is clearly a Normative reference. [1] https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -09)
Not sent
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2022-12-12 for -09)
Sent
# GEN AD review of draft-pti-pen-registration-09 CC @larseggert Thanks to Joel Halpern for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/R-8VRNKCLe8MeOR1YBSnmmCl5cs). ## Comments ### Section 2, paragraph 2 ``` IANA maintains the PEN registry in accordance with the "First Come First Served" registration policy described in [RFC8126]. Values are assigned sequentially. ``` Is it important to specify that values are assigned sequentially? Could that limit IANA's flexibility to deal with special cases? ### Section 2.1, paragraph 3 ``` IANA may refuse to process abusive requests. ``` First, is this different from other IANA registries? Second, is IANA alone determining what is considered "abusive"? ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
Warren Kumari Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2022-12-12 for -09)
Not sent
I have no idea why this document is needed, but presumably it is or people wouldn't have bothered writing it, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯