Extensions to IS-IS and OSPF for Advertising Optinal Router Capabilities
draft-raggarwa-igp-cap-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Acee Lindem | ||
| Last updated | 2002-11-05 (Latest revision 2002-06-26) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-raggarwa-igp-cap-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-raggarwa-igp-cap-01.txt
Abstract
It is useful for routers in a domain to know of the capabilities of their IGP neighbors, and/or of other routers in the domain. This draft proposes extensions to IS-IS and OSPF for advertising optional router capabilities. We define an optional Router Capability TLV for IS-IS, while for OSPF we define an optional Router Information Opaque LSA.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)