Extensions to IS-IS for Advertising Optional Router Capabilities
draft-raggarwa-isis-cap-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Acee Lindem | ||
| Last updated | 2004-02-11 (Latest revision 2003-06-05) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-raggarwa-isis-cap-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-raggarwa-isis-cap-01.txt
Abstract
It is useful for routers in an IS-IS domain to know of the capabilities of their neighbors, and/or of other routers in the domain. This draft proposes extensions to IS-IS for advertising optional router capabilities. In particular it defines an optional Router Capability TLV for IS-IS.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)