Ability for a stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP
draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-05
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Aswatnarayan Raghuram , Al Goddard , Chaitanya Yadlapalli , Jay Karthik , Siva Sivabalan , Jon Parker , Dhruv Dhody | ||
Last updated | 2017-10-30 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions provide stateful control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where a Path Computation Client (PCC) delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to a stateful PCE. There are use-cases in which a stateful PCE may wish to request and obtain control of one or more LSPs from a PCC. This document describes a simple extension to stateful PCEP to achieve such an objective.
Authors
Aswatnarayan Raghuram
Al Goddard
Chaitanya Yadlapalli
Jay Karthik
Siva Sivabalan
Jon Parker
Dhruv Dhody
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)