Sleepy Devices: Do we need to Support them in CORE?
draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Akbar Rahman | ||
| Last updated | 2014-08-15 (Latest revision 2014-02-11) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document summarizes the discussion in the CORE WG related to the question of whether support of sleepy devices is required for the CoAP protocol, CORE Link Format, CORE Resource Directory, etc. The only goal of this document is to trigger discussions in the CORE WG so that all relevant considerations for sleeping devices are taken into account.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)