Protocol for Requesting and Sharing Views across Networks
draft-ramakrishna-sat-data-sharing-01
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Venkatraman Ramakrishna , Vinayaka Pandit , Ermyas Abebe , Sandeep Nishad , Dhinakaran Vinayagamurthy | ||
Last updated | 2023-04-10 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ramakrishna-satp-data-sharing | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources |
GitHub Repository
Mailing List |
||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ramakrishna-satp-data-sharing | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
With increasing use of DLT (distributed ledger technology) systems, including blockchain systems and networks, for virtual assets, there is a need for asset-related data and metadata to traverse system boundaries and link their respective business workflows. Systems and networks can define and project views, or asset states, outside of their boundaries, as well as guard them using access control policies, and external agents or other systems can address those views in a globally unique manner. Universal interoperability requires such systems and networks to request and supply views via gateway nodes using a request-response protocol. The endpoints of this protocol lie within the respective systems or in networks of peer nodes, but the cross-system protocol occurs through the systems’ respective gateways. The inter-gateway protocol that allows an external party to request a view by an address and a DLT system to return a view in response must be DLT-neutral and mask the internal particularities and complexities of the DLT systems. The view generation and verification modules at the endpoints must obey the native consensus logic of their respective networks.
Authors
Venkatraman Ramakrishna
Vinayaka Pandit
Ermyas Abebe
Sandeep Nishad
Dhinakaran Vinayagamurthy
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)