X.509 Certificate Extended Key Usage (EKU) for Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
draft-reddy-lamps-jose-eku-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Jani Ekman , Daniel Migault | ||
| Last updated | 2023-02-13 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku, draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-reddy-lamps-jose-eku-00
LAMPS WG T. Reddy
Internet-Draft J. Ekman
Intended status: Standards Track Nokia
Expires: 17 August 2023 D. Migault
Ericsson
13 February 2023
X.509 Certificate Extended Key Usage (EKU) for Javascript Object Signing
and Encryption (JOSE) and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
draft-reddy-lamps-jose-eku-00
Abstract
RFC 5280 specifies several extended key purpose identifiers
(KeyPurposeIds) for X.509 certificates. This document defines JSON
Web Signature (JWS), JSON Web Encryption (JWE), CBOR Object Web
Signature (CWS) and CBOR Object Web Encryption (CWE) KeyPurposeIds
for inclusion in the Extended Key Usage (EKU) extension of X.509
public key certificates. An application processing JWS, JWE, CWS or
CWE may require that the EKU extension be present and that a JWS,
JWE, CWS or CWE KeyPurposeId be indicated in order for the
certificate to be acceptable to validate the JWS or CWS signature or
to encrypt a key in JWE or CWE.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 17 August 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Extended Key Purpose for JWS, JWE, CWS and CWE . . . . . . . 4
4. Including the Extended KeyPurpose for JWS, JWE, CWS and CWE in
Certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Implications for a Certification Authority . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
10. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Appendix A. ASN.1 Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1. Introduction
[RFC5280] specifies several extended key purpose identifiers
(KeyPurposeIds) for X.509 certificates. In addition, the IANA
repository "SMI Security for PKIX Extended Key Purpose" [RFC7299]
includes a number of KeyPurposeIds. While usage of the
anyExtendedKeyUsage KeyPurposeId is bad practice for publicly trusted
certificates (multi-purpose or single-purpose), there are no extended
key purpose identifiers explicitly assigned for JSON Web Signature
(JWS) [RFC7515] and JSON Web Encryption (JWE) [RFC7516] or their CBOR
Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) [RFC9052] counterparts defined
as CBOR Object Web Signature (CWS) and CBOR Object Web Encryption
(CWE). JSON Web Signature (JWS) and CBOR Object Web Signature (CWS)
represents content secured with digital signatures or Message
Authentication Codes (MACs) using JSON-based [RFC7159] data
structures and CBOR-based [RFC8949] data structures. The JWS and CWS
cryptographic mechanisms provide integrity protection for an
arbitrary sequence of octets. JSON Web Encryption (JWE) and CBOR
Object Web Encryption (CWE) represents encrypted content using JSON-
based and CBOR-based data structures. The JWE and CWE cryptographic
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
mechanisms encrypt and provide integrity protection for an arbitrary
sequence of octets. The cryptographic algorithms and identifiers to
be used with the JSON Web Signature (JWS), JSON Web Encryption (JWE),
CBOR Object Web Signature (CWS) and CBOR Object Web Encryption (CWE)
are defined in [RFC7518] and [RFC9052].
Network Functions (NFs) as part of the service-based architecture
within the 5G System [TS23.501]. The Operators of 5G systems make
use of an internal PKI to generate X.509 PKI certificates for the NFs
in a 5G system. The certificates are used for the following
purposes:
* Client and Server certificates for NFs in 5GC Service Based
Architecture (Section 6.1.3c of [TS33.310])
* Certificates for signing Client Credentials Assertion (CCA) tokens
using JWS (Section 13.3.8.2 of [TS33.501])
* Certificates for encrypting JSON objects in HTTP messages between
Security Edge Protection Proxies (SEPPs) using JWE
(Section 13.2.4.4 of [TS33.501]) and Section 6.3.2 of [TS33.210])
* Certificates for signing the OAuth 2.0 access tokens for service
authorization to grant temporary access to resources provided by
NF producers using JWS (Section 13.4.1 of [TS33.501])
If the purpose of the issued certificates is not restricted, i.e.,
the type of operations for which a public key contained in the
certificate can be used are not specified, those certificates could
be used for another purpose than intended, violating the CA policies,
and increasing the risk of cross-protocol attacks. Failure to ensure
proper segregation of duties means that a NF who generates the
public/private keys and applies for a certificate to the operator CA,
could obtain a certificate which can be misused for tasks that this
NF is not entitled to perform. For example, a NF service consumer
could impersonate NF service producers using its certificate.
Another example, if the purpose of the certificate is for the NF
service consumer is to use it as a client certificate, the NF with
this client certificate and corresponding private key must not be
allowed to sign the CCA. When a NF service producer receives the
signed CCA from the NF service consumer, the NF would accept the
token even if CCA is signed with a certificate not issued for this
purpose.
The KeyPurposeId id-kp-serverAuth (Section 4.2.1.12 of [RFC5280]) can
be used to identify that the certificate is for a server (e.g., NF
service producer), and the KeyPurposeId id-kp-clientAuth
(Section 4.2.1.12 of [RFC5280]) can be used to identify that the
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
certificate is for a client (e.g., NF service consumer). However,
there is no KeyPurposeIds to identify whether the certificate can be
used to generate JWS, JWE, CWS or CWE.
Vendor-defined KeyPurposeIds that are used in a PKI governed by the
vendor or a group of vendors pose no interoperability concern.
Appropriating, or misappropriating as the case may be, KeyPurposeIds
for use outside of their originally intended vendor or group of
vendors controlled environment can introduce problems, the impact of
which is difficult to determine. Therefore, it is not favorable to
use vendor-defined KeyPurposeIds for JWS, JWE, CWS and CWE in
deployments that are not governed by the vendor.
This document defines extended key purpose identifiers for JWS, JWE,
CWS and CWE.
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
CBOR Object Web Signature (CWS): Signing Object of a CBOR Object
Signing and Encryption (COSE) defined in Section 4 of [RFC9052].
CBOR Object Web Encryption (CWE): Encryption Object of a CBOR Object
Signing and Encryption (COSE) defined in Section 5 of [RFC9052] .
3. Extended Key Purpose for JWS, JWE, CWS and CWE
This specification defines the KeyPurposeIds id-kp-jws, id-kp-jwe,
id-kp-cws and id-kp-cwe. As described in [RFC5280], "[i]f the
[Extended Key Usage] extension is present, then the certificate MUST
only be used for one of the purposes indicated." [RFC5280] also
notes that "[i]f multiple [key] purposes are indicated the
application need not recognize all purposes indicated, as long as the
intended purpose is present."
Applications processing JWS, JWE, CWS or CWE MAY require that the EKU
extension be present and that the id-kp-jws, id-kp-jwe, id-kp-cws or
id-kp-cwe be indicated in order for the certificate to be acceptable
to validate the JWS or CWS Signature or to encrypt the Content
Encryption Key (CEK) in JWE or CWE.
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
4. Including the Extended KeyPurpose for JWS, JWE, CWS and CWE in
Certificates
[RFC5280] specifies the EKU X.509 certificate extension for use on
end entity certificates. The extension indicates one or more
purposes for which the certified public key is valid. The EKU
extension can be used in conjunction with the key usage extension,
which indicates the set of basic cryptographic operations for which
the certified key may be used. The EKU extension syntax is repeated
here for convenience:
ExtKeyUsageSyntax ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF KeyPurposeId
KeyPurposeId ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
As described in [RFC5280], the EKU extension may, at the option of
the certificate issuer, be either critical or non-critical. This
specification defines the KeyPurposeIds id-kp-jws, id-kp-jwe, id-kp-
cws and id-kp-cwe. Inclusion of KeyPurposeId id-kp-jws or id-kp-cws
in a certificate indicates that the public key encoded in the
certificate has been certified to be used for validating the JWS or
CWS signature. Inclusion of KeyPurposeId id-kp-jwe or id-kp-cwe in a
certificate indicates that the public key encoded in the certificate
has been certified to be used for encrypting the CEK in JWE (for
example, encrypt the CEK with the recipient's public key using the
RSAES-OAEP algorithm to produce the JWE or CWE Encrypted Key).
id-kp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) kp(3) }
id-kp-jws OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD1 }
id-kp-jwe OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD2 }
id-kp-cws OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD3 }
id-kp-cwe OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD4 }
5. Implications for a Certification Authority
The procedures and practices employed by a certification authority
MUST ensure that the correct values for the EKU extension are
inserted in each certificate that is issued. Unless certificates are
governed by a vendor-specific PKI, certificates that indicate usage
for JWS, JWE, SWS or CWE MAY include the id-kp-jws, id-kp-jwe, id-kp-
cws or id-kp-cwe KeyPurposeId. The inclusion of the id-kp-jws, id-
kp-jwe, id-kp-cws or id-kp-cwe KeyPurposeIds does not preclude the
inclusion of other KeyPurposeIds.
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
6. Security Considerations
The Security Considerations of [RFC5280] are applicable to this
document. This extended key purpose does not introduce new security
risks but instead reduces existing security risks by providing means
to identify if the certificate is generated to process JWS or CWS
signature or to encrypt the CEK in JWE or CWE.
To reduce the risk of specific cross-protocol attacks, the relying
party or the relying party software may additionally prohibit use of
specific combinations of KeyPurposeIds. The procedure of using
Excluded KeyPurposeId and Permitted KeyPurposeId by an relying party
to permit or prohibit combinations of KeyPurposeIds is defined in
Section 4 of [RFC9336]. Examples of Excluded KeyPurposeId include
the presence of the anyExtendedKeyUsage KeyPurposeId or the complete
absence of the EKU extension in a certificate. Examples of Permitted
KeyPurposeId include the presence of JWS, JWE, CWS or CWE
KeyPurposeId.
7. Privacy Considerations
In some security protocols, such as TLS 1.2 [RFC5246], certificates
are exchanged in the clear. In other security protocols, such as TLS
1.3 [RFC8446], the certificates are encrypted. The inclusion of EKU
extension can help an observer determine the purpose of the
certificate. In addition, If the certificate is issued by a public
certification authority, the inclusion of EKU extension can help an
attacker to monitor the Certificate Transparency logs [RFC9162] to
identify the purpose of the certificate.
8. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to register the following OIDs in the "SMI Security
for PKIX Extended Key Purpose" registry (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3). This OID
is defined in Section 4.
+=========+=======================+============+
| Decimal | Description | References |
+=========+=======================+============+
| TBD1 | id-kp-jws | This-RFC |
+---------+-----------------------+------------+
| TBD2 | id-kp-jwe | This-RFC |
+---------+-----------------------+------------+
| TBD3 | id-kp-cws | This-RFC |
+---------+-----------------------+------------+
| TBD4 | id-kp-cwe | This-RFC |
+---------+-----------------------+------------+
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
Figure 1: Table 1
IANA is also requested to register the following ASN.1[X.680] module
OID in the "SMI Security for PKIX Module Identifier" registry
(1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0). This OID is defined in Appendix A.
+=========+====================+============+
| Decimal | Description | References |
+=========+======================+============+
| TBD4 | id-mod-jose+cose-eku | TBD5 |
+---------+----------------------+------------+
Figure 2: Table 2
9. Contributors
The following individuals have contributed to this document:
German Peinado
Nokia
Email: german.peinado@nokia.com
10. Acknowledgments
Thanks to Russ Housley for the discussion and comments.
11. References
11.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5280>.
[RFC7159] Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data
Interchange Format", RFC 7159, DOI 10.17487/RFC7159, March
2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7159>.
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
[RFC7515] Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web
Signature (JWS)", RFC 7515, DOI 10.17487/RFC7515, May
2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7515>.
[RFC7516] Jones, M. and J. Hildebrand, "JSON Web Encryption (JWE)",
RFC 7516, DOI 10.17487/RFC7516, May 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7516>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8949] Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object
Representation (CBOR)", STD 94, RFC 8949,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8949, December 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8949>.
[RFC9052] Schaad, J., "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE):
Structures and Process", STD 96, RFC 9052,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9052, August 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9052>.
11.2. Informative References
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5246>.
[RFC7299] Housley, R., "Object Identifier Registry for the PKIX
Working Group", RFC 7299, DOI 10.17487/RFC7299, July 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7299>.
[RFC7518] Jones, M., "JSON Web Algorithms (JWA)", RFC 7518,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7518, May 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7518>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446>.
[RFC9162] Laurie, B., Messeri, E., and R. Stradling, "Certificate
Transparency Version 2.0", RFC 9162, DOI 10.17487/RFC9162,
December 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9162>.
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
[RFC9336] Ito, T., Okubo, T., and S. Turner, "X.509 Certificate
General-Purpose Extended Key Usage (EKU) for Document
Signing", RFC 9336, DOI 10.17487/RFC9336, December 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9336>.
[TS23.501] "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System
architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release
18), 3GPP TS 23.501 V18.0.0 Dec 2022,",
<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/
archive/23_series/23.501/23501-i00.zip>.
[TS33.210] "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects;Network
Domain Security (NDS); IP network layer security (Release
17), 3GPP TS 33.210 V17.1.0 Sept 2022,",
<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/
archive/33_series/33.210/33210-h10.zip>.
[TS33.310] "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Network
Domain Security (NDS); Authentication Framework (AF)
(Release 17), 3GPP 33.310 V17.4.0, Sept 2022,",
<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/
archive/33_series/33.310/33310-h40.zip>.
[TS33.501] "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Security
architecture and procedures for 5G system (Release 17), ,
3GPP TS:33.501 V17.7.0, Sept 2022,",
<https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/
archive/33_series/33.501/33501-h70.zip>.
[X.680] "ITU-T, "Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation", ITU-T
Recommendation X.680, February 2021.",
<https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.680>.
[X.690] "ITU-T, "Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
(DER)", ITU-T Recommendation X.690, February 2021,",
<https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690>.
Appendix A. ASN.1 Module
The following module adheres to ASN.1 specifications [X.680] and
[X.690].
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft EKU for JOSE and COSE February 2023
<CODE BEGINS>
JOSE-EKU
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
id-mod-jose-eku(TBD4) }
DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
-- OID Arc
id-kp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) kp(3) }
-- Extended Key Usage Values
id-kp-jws OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD1 }
id-kp-jwe OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD2 }
id-kp-cws OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD3 }
id-kp-cwe OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-kp TBD4 }
END
<CODE ENDS>
Authors' Addresses
Tirumaleswar Reddy
Nokia
India
Email: kondtir@gmail.com
Jani Ekman
Nokia
Finland
Email: jani.ekman@nokia.com
Daniel Migault
Ericsson
Canada
Email: daniel.migault@ericsson.com
Reddy, et al. Expires 17 August 2023 [Page 10]