Problem Statement of Multi-requirement Extensions for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (dhc WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2019-05-15 (latest revision 2019-03-10) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6 | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01.txt
Abstract
The manageability, security, privacy protection, and traceability of networks can be supported by extending DHCPv6 protocol. This document analyzes current extension practices and typical DHCP server software on extensions, defines a DHCP general model, discusses some extension points, and present extension cases.
Authors
Ren Gang
(rengang@cernet.edu.cn)
Lin He
(he-l14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn)
Ying Liu
(liuying@cernet.edu.cn)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)