%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option instead of this I-D.
@techreport{renker-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option-01,
    number =    {draft-renker-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-renker-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option/01/},
    author =    {Gerrit Renker and Gorry Fairhurst},
    title =     {{Sender RTT Estimate Option for DCCP}},
    pagetotal = 18,
    year =      2010,
    month =     aug,
    day =       18,
    abstract =  {This document describes an update to CCID-3/4 that addresses parameter-estimation problems occurring with TFRC-based DCCP congestion control. The fix uses a recommendation made in the original TFRC specification. It avoids the inherent problems of receiver-based RTT sampling, by utilising higher-accuracy RTT samples already available at the sender. It is integrated into the feature set of DCCP as an end-to-end negotiable extension, upward and downward compatible.},
}