RFC 2731 ("Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML") Is Obsolete
draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-05
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
05 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings |
2012-08-22
|
05 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu |
2009-12-10
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
2009-12-10
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2009-12-10
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2009-12-10
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2009-12-10
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the document |
2009-12-10
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2009-12-10
|
05 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings |
2009-12-08
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu |
2009-12-04
|
05 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03 |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Rob Austein. |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
2009-12-03
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-05.txt |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot discuss] I'd like a stable normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731. |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot comment] I support Cullen's DISCUSS about the need for a normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731. |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot discuss] If this document is turned into an RFC then 2731 must be a Normative reference. |
2009-12-03
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot discuss] On the call I would like to talk about what happens next process wise (does this draft become an RFC or do we … [Ballot discuss] On the call I would like to talk about what happens next process wise (does this draft become an RFC or do we jut mark things obsolete? I'd like a stable normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731. It seems to me that it should be http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/ not http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-html/ but I really don't know. |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot comment] Appendix C., paragraph 7: > julian.reschke@greenbytes.de (2009-10-08): It's not clear whether > this case is really a candidate for reclassification as … [Ballot comment] Appendix C., paragraph 7: > julian.reschke@greenbytes.de (2009-10-08): It's not clear whether > this case is really a candidate for reclassification as "historic". > After all, the format that was described in RFC 2731 is still in use > in Dublin Core's DC-HTML; it just got revised. Whether the format is still in use doesn't really matter. It seems that RFC 2731 is no longer the definitive spec (it is obsoleted by later DC work) and so IMO it should be made historic. |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel |
2009-12-02
|
05 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
2009-12-01
|
05 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | (1.a) I, Bernard Desruisseaux, am the Document Shepherd for this document. I have personally reviewed draft -04 of … (1.a) I, Bernard Desruisseaux, am the Document Shepherd for this document. I have personally reviewed draft -04 of the document and I believe this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication. (1.b) This document has had adequate review from members of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and the IETF. (1.c) This document has had sufficient review. (1.d) I don't have any concerns with this document. (1.e) There is a good consensus behind this document. Members of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative have supported this work, furthermore the original author of RFC 2731 is actually a co-author of this document. (1.f) Nobody threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent. (1.g) I have personally verified that the document satisfies all ID nits. (1.h) The document only specifies an informative reference to the RFC being obsoleted. (1.i) The document has an IANA Considerations section that clarifies that no IANA actions are required. (1.j) The document doesn't include any material written in a formal language. (1.k) Here's the Document Annoucement Write-up that should be included in the IESG approval annoucement: Technical Summary This document obsoletes RFC 2731, on Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML, to raise the awareness within the IETF that further development of this specification has moved to the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Working Group Summary This document is the work of individual submitters. It was reviewed and supported by members of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative community. Last call comments were received and addressed. Document Quality This document is of administrative nature only. |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | State Change Notice email list have been change to julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, draft-reschke-rfc2731bis@tools.ietf.org, bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com from julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, draft-reschke-rfc2731bis@tools.ietf.org |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | [Note]: 'Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd. RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly … [Note]: 'Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd. RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document.' added by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-11-20
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Created "Approve" ballot |
2009-11-19
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-04.txt |
2009-11-18
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-11-18
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03 by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-10-08
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-03.txt |
2009-10-07
|
05 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2009-10-01
|
05 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2009-09-10
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein |
2009-09-10
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
05 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2009-09-09
|
05 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2009-09-09
|
05 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-09
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | [Note]: 'RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an … [Note]: 'RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document.' added by Alexey Melnikov |
2009-09-08
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Area acronymn has been changed to app from gen |
2009-09-08
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None |
2009-08-20
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-02.txt |
2009-08-19
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-01.txt |
2009-08-19
|
05 | Alexey Melnikov | Draft Added by Alexey Melnikov in state AD is watching |
2009-06-01
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-00.txt |