Skip to main content

RFC 2731 ("Encoding Dublin Core Metadata in HTML") Is Obsolete
draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2009-12-10
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-12-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-12-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-12-10
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-12-10
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2009-12-10
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-12-10
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2009-12-08
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-04
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03
2009-12-03
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Rob Austein.
2009-12-03
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-12-03
05 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-05.txt
2009-12-03
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
I'd like a stable normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731.
2009-12-03
05 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-12-03
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-12-03
05 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-12-03
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-12-03
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
I support Cullen's DISCUSS about the need for a normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731.
2009-12-03
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot discuss]
If this document is turned into an RFC then 2731 must be a Normative reference.
2009-12-03
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-02
05 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
On the call I would like to talk about what happens next process wise (does this draft become an RFC or do we …
[Ballot discuss]
On the call I would like to talk about what happens next process wise (does this draft become an RFC or do we jut mark things obsolete?

I'd like a stable normative reference to the document that obsoletes 2731. It seems to me that it should be http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/08/04/dc-html/ not http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-html/ but I really don't know.
2009-12-02
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-12-02
05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Appendix C., paragraph 7:

>    julian.reschke@greenbytes.de (2009-10-08): It's not clear whether
>    this case is really a candidate for reclassification as …
[Ballot comment]
Appendix C., paragraph 7:

>    julian.reschke@greenbytes.de (2009-10-08): It's not clear whether
>    this case is really a candidate for reclassification as "historic".
>    After all, the format that was described in RFC 2731 is still in use
>    in Dublin Core's DC-HTML; it just got revised.

  Whether the format is still in use doesn't really matter. It seems
  that RFC 2731 is no longer the definitive spec (it is obsoleted by
  later DC work) and so IMO it should be made historic.
2009-12-02
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-12-02
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-12-02
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-12-02
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-12-02
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-12-02
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-12-01
05 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov
  (1.a) I, Bernard Desruisseaux, am the Document Shepherd for
        this document. I have personally reviewed draft -04 of
    …
  (1.a) I, Bernard Desruisseaux, am the Document Shepherd for
        this document. I have personally reviewed draft -04 of
        the document and I believe this version is ready for
        forwarding to the IESG for publication.

  (1.b) This document has had adequate review from members of
        the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and the IETF.

  (1.c) This document has had sufficient review.

  (1.d) I don't have any concerns with this document.

  (1.e) There is a good consensus behind this document.
        Members of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative have
        supported this work, furthermore the original author
        of RFC 2731 is actually a co-author of this document.

  (1.f) Nobody threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme
        discontent.

  (1.g) I have personally verified that the document satisfies
        all ID nits.

  (1.h) The document only specifies an informative reference to
        the RFC being obsoleted.

  (1.i) The document has an IANA Considerations section that
        clarifies that no IANA actions are required.

  (1.j) The document doesn't include any material written in a
        formal language.

  (1.k) Here's the Document Annoucement Write-up that should be
        included in the IESG approval annoucement:

    Technical Summary

        This document obsoletes RFC 2731, on Encoding Dublin Core
        Metadata in HTML, to raise the awareness within the IETF
        that further development of this specification has moved
        to the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative.

    Working Group Summary

        This document is the work of individual submitters. It was
        reviewed and supported by members of the Dublin Core Metadata
        Initiative community. Last call comments were received and
        addressed.

    Document Quality

        This document is of administrative nature only.
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov State Change Notice email list have been change to julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, draft-reschke-rfc2731bis@tools.ietf.org, bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com from julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, draft-reschke-rfc2731bis@tools.ietf.org
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Note]: 'Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd.
RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly …
[Note]: 'Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com> is the document shepherd.
RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document.' added by Alexey Melnikov
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov
2009-11-20
05 Alexey Melnikov Created "Approve" ballot
2009-11-19
04 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-04.txt
2009-11-18
05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov
2009-11-18
05 Alexey Melnikov Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03 by Alexey Melnikov
2009-10-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-03.txt
2009-10-07
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-10-01
05 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-09-10
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein
2009-09-10
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein
2009-09-09
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-09-09
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-09-09
05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alexey Melnikov
2009-09-09
05 Alexey Melnikov Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov
2009-09-09
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-09-09
05 (System) Last call text was added
2009-09-09
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-09-09
05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alexey Melnikov
2009-09-09
05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov
2009-09-09
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Note]: 'RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an …
[Note]: 'RFC Editor seems to be fine with the idea of obsoleting an RFC submitted directly to RFC Editor (e.g. RFC 2731) with an AD sponsored document.' added by Alexey Melnikov
2009-09-08
05 Alexey Melnikov Area acronymn has been changed to app from gen
2009-09-08
05 Alexey Melnikov Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None
2009-08-20
02 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-02.txt
2009-08-19
01 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-01.txt
2009-08-19
05 Alexey Melnikov Draft Added by Alexey Melnikov in state AD is watching
2009-06-01
00 (System) New version available: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-00.txt