%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id instead of this I-D. @techreport{rescorla-tls-dtls-connection-id-02, number = {draft-rescorla-tls-dtls-connection-id-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-dtls-connection-id/02/}, author = {Eric Rescorla and Hannes Tschofenig and Thomas Fossati and Tobias Gondrom}, title = {{The Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Connection Identifier}}, pagetotal = 12, year = 2017, month = nov, day = 14, abstract = {This document specifies the "Connection ID" concept for the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol, version 1.2 and version 1.3. A Connection ID is an identifier carried in the record layer header that gives the recipient additional information for selecting the appropriate security association. In "classical" DTLS, selecting a security association of an incoming DTLS record is accomplished with the help of the 5-tuple. If the source IP address and/or source port changes during the lifetime of an ongoing DTLS session then the receiver will be unable to locate the correct security context.}, }