Operatonal Considerations for Voucher infrastructure for BRSKI MASA
draft-richardson-anima-masa-considerations-05
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Michael Richardson , Jie Yang | ||
Last updated | 2021-09-13 (Latest revision 2021-03-12) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes a number of operational modes that a BRSKI Manufacturer Authorized Signing Authority (MASA) may take on. Each mode is defined, and then each mode is given a relevance within an over applicability of what kind of organization the MASA is deployed into. This document does not change any protocol mechanisms.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)