Challenges in Smart Object Security: too many layers, not enough ram
draft-richardson-smartobject-security-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | |||
| Last updated | 2012-08-10 (Latest revision 2012-02-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This is a position paper for the pre-IETF83 Workshop on Smart Object Security. The author contends that layer-2 security solutions are not only in-adequate, but may in fact be harmful when deployed into smart object systems. While layer-2 security services may be valuable, they must be channel bound up to the layer-7 application layer.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)