Data Modelling and Gap Analysis of Optical Pluggables in Packet Over Optical Network
draft-rokui-ccamp-actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling-03
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(ccamp WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Reza Rokui , Aihua Guo , Phil Bedard , Swamynathan Balasundaram , Gert Grammel | ||
| Last updated | 2025-11-25 (Latest revision 2025-09-09) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-ccamp-actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft outlines the pluggable module attributes within a host device. It includes representations of optical pluggable module capabilities, configuration, states, and telemetry data. These attributes draws from existing IETF standards and incorporates input from other industry forums and standards, such as ITU-T, OpenConfig, OIF and ONF TAPI, to ensure uniform structuring and consistent naming conventions. Note that the IETF terminology shall be given precedence wherever possible. In case there is a duplication of an attribute, this draft may describe how the attribute is named in the related document. Only if no attribute exists in IETF RFCs or IETF WG drafts, new attributes shall be introduced if they are needed. This draft provides a gap analysis with respect to existing IETF work in the following areas: * It provides an analysis of optical attributes in a set of IETF documents with specifications of other organizations to identify modeling gaps. * It identifies modeling needs addressing the specific aspect of pluggability of transceiver modules. The authors recognize the fact that that not all pluggable modules are coherent, not all coherent pluggable modules are DWDM capable and not all DWDM capable interfaces are implemented as pluggable modules. This analysis identifies gaps to manage the lifecycle of an optical pluggable module, from operator approval and viability assessment, to deployment, monitoring and phase-out. The lifecycle of an optical pluggable module, from operator approval and viability assessment to deployment and monitoring, is also addressed. About This Document This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://italobusi.github.io/actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling/draft-rokui- ccamp-actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft- rokui-ccamp-actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling/. Discussion of this document takes place on the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group mailing list (mailto:ccamp@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp/. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/italobusi/actn-wdm-pluggable-modelling.
Authors
Reza Rokui
Aihua Guo
Phil Bedard
Swamynathan Balasundaram
Gert Grammel
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)