%% You should probably cite draft-ecrit-lost-planned-changes instead of this I-D. @techreport{rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-02, number = {draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosen-ecrit-lost-planned-changes/02/}, author = {Brian Rosen}, title = {{Validation of Locations Around a Planned Change}}, pagetotal = 9, year = 2015, month = jul, day = 20, abstract = {This document defines an extension to LoST (RFC5222) that allows a planned change to the data in the LoST server to occur. Records that previously were valid will become invalid at a date in the future, and new locations will become valid after the date. The extension adds two elements to the \textless{}findservice\textgreater{} request: a URI to be used to inform the LIS that previously valid locations will be invalid after the planned change date, and add a date which requests the server to perform validation as of the date specified. It also adds a TTL element to the response, which informs all queriers the current expected lifetime of the validation.}, }