%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-idr-extcomm-iana instead of this I-D.
@techreport{rosen-idr-extcomm-iana-00,
    number =    {draft-rosen-idr-extcomm-iana-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosen-idr-extcomm-iana/00/},
    author =    {Eric C. Rosen and Yakov Rekhter},
    title =     {{IANA Registries for BGP Extended Communities}},
    pagetotal = 17,
    year =      2013,
    month =     may,
    day =       30,
    abstract =  {This document reorganizes the IANA Registries for the type values and sub-type values of BGP Extended Communities attribute and the BGP IPv6-Address-Specific Extended Communities attribute. This is done in order to remove inter-dependencies among the registries, thus making it easier for IANA to determine which codepoints are available for assignment in which registries. This document also clarifies the information that must be provided to IANA when requesting an allocation from one or more of these registries. These changes are compatible with the existing allocations, and thus do not affect protocol implementations. The changes will however impact the "IANA Considerations" sections of future protocol specifications. This document updates RFCs 4360 and 5701.},
}