Skip to main content

Responsibility Change for the RFC Series
draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-02

Yes

(Lars Eggert)

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment (2022-03-10 for -01) Sent
Thank you for the work done in this document.

Thanks to Wassim who did the INT directorate review at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-intdir-lc-haddad-2022-02-22/

(Same typo identified by Rob Wilton).

Regards

-éric
Erik Kline
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2022-03-08 for -01) Not sent
Thank you to Magnus Nystrom for the SECDIR review.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2022-03-10) Sent
Thanks for addressing my discuss.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -01) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2022-03-08 for -01) Sent
(1) It should be indicated somewhere that this document should be part of BCP 9.  I prefer an RFC Editor Note in the ballot/IESG Writeup.  I did notice that the header includes "Updates:...BCP 9", but (trying not to get into the meaning of "updates") only RFCs should be listed there.

(2) The reference to draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model should be Normative because it must be read to understand the change being made.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2022-03-13) Sent for earlier
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS point.
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2022-03-07 for -01) Sent
One minor nit:

It no longer => It is no longer

Thanks,
Rob