Skip to main content

RFC Series Responsibility Change
draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-02

Yes

Lars Eggert

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
John Scudder
Martin Duke
Murray Kucherawy

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Yes

Éric Vyncke Yes

Comment (2022-03-10 for -01)
Thank you for the work done in this document.

Thanks to Wassim who did the INT directorate review at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-intdir-lc-haddad-2022-02-22/

(Same typo identified by Rob Wilton).

Regards

-éric

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2022-03-08 for -01)
(1) It should be indicated somewhere that this document should be part of BCP 9.  I prefer an RFC Editor Note in the ballot/IESG Writeup.  I did notice that the header includes "Updates:...BCP 9", but (trying not to get into the meaning of "updates") only RFCs should be listed there.

(2) The reference to draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model should be Normative because it must be read to understand the change being made.

Erik Kline No Objection

Francesca Palombini No Objection

John Scudder No Objection

Martin Duke No Objection

Murray Kucherawy No Objection

Robert Wilton No Objection

Comment (2022-03-07 for -01)
One minor nit:

It no longer => It is no longer

Thanks,
Rob

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Comment (2022-03-08 for -01)
Thank you to Magnus Nystrom for the SECDIR review.

Zaheduzzaman Sarker (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2022-03-10)
Thanks for addressing my discuss.

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2022-03-13)
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS point.