RFC Series Responsibility Change
draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-02
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Yes
Éric Vyncke Yes
Thank you for the work done in this document. Thanks to Wassim who did the INT directorate review at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-intdir-lc-haddad-2022-02-22/ (Same typo identified by Rob Wilton). Regards -éric
Alvaro Retana No Objection
(1) It should be indicated somewhere that this document should be part of BCP 9. I prefer an RFC Editor Note in the ballot/IESG Writeup. I did notice that the header includes "Updates:...BCP 9", but (trying not to get into the meaning of "updates") only RFCs should be listed there. (2) The reference to draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model should be Normative because it must be read to understand the change being made.
Erik Kline No Objection
Francesca Palombini No Objection
John Scudder No Objection
Martin Duke No Objection
Murray Kucherawy No Objection
Robert Wilton No Objection
One minor nit: It no longer => It is no longer Thanks, Rob
Roman Danyliw No Objection
Thank you to Magnus Nystrom for the SECDIR review.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressing my discuss.
(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS point.