Skip to main content

The Management Policy of the Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Changed to "IETF Review"
draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-01

The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7134.
Author Brian Rosen
Last updated 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2013-08-19)
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Adam Roach
Shepherd write-up Show Last changed 2013-11-19
IESG IESG state Became RFC 7134 (Proposed Standard)
Action Holders
(None)
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD Richard Barnes
Send notices to (None)
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - Actions Needed
IANA action state RFC-Ed-Ack
draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-01
sipcore                                                         B. Rosen
Internet-Draft                                                   NeuStar
Updates: 4412 (if approved)                              August 19, 2013
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: February 20, 2014

Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry Management Policy to IETF Review
                     draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-01

Abstract

   RFC4412 defines "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority
   Priority-values" registries.  The management policy of these
   registries is "Standards Action".  This document normatively updates
   RFC4412 ti change the management policy of these registries to "IETF
   Review".

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 20, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Rosen                   Expires February 20, 2014               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           RPH Registry Management             August 2013

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3

1.  Introduction

   [RFC4412] defines "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-
   Priority Priority-values" registries.  The management policy of these
   registries is "Standards Action" as defined in [RFC5226].  Experience
   has suggested that a document that only defines a new namespace with
   its priorities, and does not create new protocol semantics, should
   not be a standards-track document.  This document updates [RFC4412]
   to change the management policy of the registries to "IETF Review".

2.  Security Considerations

   This document does not introduce any the security considerations
   beyond those in [RFC4412].

3.  IANA Considerations

   Change the management policy of management policy of the "Resource-
   Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values"
   registries to "IETF Review" as defined in [RFC5226].

4.  Normative References

   [RFC4412]  Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource
              Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC
              4412, February 2006.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008.

Rosen                   Expires February 20, 2014               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft           RPH Registry Management             August 2013

Author's Address

   Brian Rosen
   NeuStar
   470 Conrad Dr.
   Mars, PA  16046
   US

   Phone: +1 724 382 1051
   Email: br@brianrosen.net

Rosen                   Expires February 20, 2014               [Page 3]