%% You should probably cite draft-rsalz-2026bis-12 instead of this revision.
@techreport{rsalz-2026bis-10,
    number =    {draft-rsalz-2026bis-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsalz-2026bis/10/},
    author =    {Rich Salz and Scott O. Bradner},
    title =     {{The Internet Standards Process}},
    pagetotal = 57,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This memo documents the process used by the Internet community for the standardization of protocols and procedures. It defines the stages in the standardization process, the requirements for moving a document between stages and the types of documents used during this process. It also addresses the intellectual property rights and copyright issues associated with the standards process. This document obsoletes RFC2026, RFC5657, RFC6410, RFC7100, RFC7127, RFC7475, RFC8179, RFC8789, and RFC9282. It updates RFC5378, RFC5657. It also updated RFC7475, and with {[}bis2418{]}, obsoletes it.},
}