Cisco Systems' Private VLANs: Scalable Security in a Multi-Client Environment
draft-sanjib-private-vlan-10
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2012-08-22
|
10 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert |
|
2008-08-19
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-10.txt |
|
2008-07-31
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-07-21
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2008-07-21
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2008-07-21
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Mark Townsley | Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] I support Lars's Discuss. In addition, in my quick review I came to the conclusion that its hard to classify this as anything … [Ballot comment] I support Lars's Discuss. In addition, in my quick review I came to the conclusion that its hard to classify this as anything else than RFC 3932 response 1. No protocol is extended, this is merely a way to use bridges and set up subnets. Having said that, I have real concerns about the document. For instance, the document does not contain the words "multicast" or "IPv6" and explain what its arrangement does for those. The document does not explain what, if anything, breaks when you do this. I suspect something does. Also, I would be very interested in understanding the role of this document vs. deployment models in DSL. If this is something that DSL Forum would be relying on, for instance, we should rather review this in the IETF so that some of the above issues could be checked. Or is this purely a vendor spec? |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko |
|
2008-07-17
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2008-07-16
|
10 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot discuss] will update when see what we are doing ... |
|
2008-07-16
|
10 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
|
2008-07-16
|
10 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by David Ward |
|
2008-07-16
|
10 | (System) | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system |
|
2008-07-15
|
10 | Amanda Baber | IANA Evaluation comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2008-07-11
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot discuss] Mark, which RFC3932 response are you proposing for this document? (Putting this in as a discuss so it doesn't slip through.) |
|
2008-07-11
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
|
2008-07-04
|
10 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-07-03 |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | Mark Townsley | Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | Mark Townsley | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2008-07-03
|
10 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2008-06-23
|
10 | Mark Townsley | Area acronymn has been changed to int from gen |
|
2008-06-23
|
10 | Mark Townsley | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-07-03 by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-06-23
|
10 | Mark Townsley | [Note]: 'This is an independent submission, going on telechat for RFC3932 check.' added by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-04-08
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested |
|
2008-03-11
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-09.txt |
|
2007-06-18
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-08.txt |
|
2007-05-25
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-07.txt |
|
2007-02-16
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-06.txt |
|
2006-02-13
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-05.txt |
|
2005-12-29
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-04.txt |
|
2005-04-29
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-03.txt |
|
2004-06-18
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-02.txt |
|
2004-06-14
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-sanjib-private-vlan-01.txt | |
|
2004-05-11
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-01.txt |
|
2003-09-25
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-sanjib-private-vlan-00.txt |