IPv6 Prefix Sharing Problem Use Case
draft-sarikaya-aps-prefix-sharing-usecase-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Behcet Sarikaya , Marco Spini, Dirk Von Hugo | ||
| Last updated | 2014-04-24 (Latest revision 2013-10-21) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In case a given fixed network is policy converged with the mobile network, i.e if Policy for Convergence is deployed, host specific quality of service and charging can be applied to the hosts connecting using the wireless local area network access or some other means. When local or visiting hosts are assigned their addresses using IPv6 prefix sharing, the edge router is unable to provide host specific quality of service and charging. We explain both stateless and stateful address assignment cases.
Authors
Behcet Sarikaya
Marco Spini
Dirk Von Hugo
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)