IPv6 Prefix Sharing Problem Use Case
draft-sarikaya-aps-prefix-sharing-usecase-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Behcet Sarikaya , Marco Spini , Dirk v. Hugo | ||
| Last updated | 2014-04-24 (Latest revision 2013-10-21) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sarikaya-aps-prefix-sharing-usecase-00.txt
Abstract
In case a given fixed network is policy converged with the mobile network, i.e if Policy for Convergence is deployed, host specific quality of service and charging can be applied to the hosts connecting using the wireless local area network access or some other means. When local or visiting hosts are assigned their addresses using IPv6 prefix sharing, the edge router is unable to provide host specific quality of service and charging. We explain both stateless and stateful address assignment cases.
Authors
Behcet Sarikaya
Marco Spini
Dirk v. Hugo
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)