Evaluation of Possible CAPWAP Protocols
draft-sarikaya-capwap-evaluate-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Behcet Sarikaya , Andy Lee | ||
| Last updated | 2005-04-22 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sarikaya-capwap-evaluate-00.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sarikaya-capwap-evaluate-00.txt
Abstract
This documents evaluates the protocols submitted to CAPWAP WG in April 2005. The objectives document is used as the evaluation criteria. All of the objectives are considered one by one and three protocols (LWAPP, CTP and WiCoP) are evaluated vis-a-vis these criteria. The results indicate conformance to most of the criteria by all three protocols.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)