PIM-SM Multicast Routing Security Issues and Enhancements
draft-savola-mboned-mroutesec-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Pekka Savola , Pekka Savola , Rami Lehtonen , David Meyer | ||
| Last updated | 2004-01-23 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo describes security threats for the larger (intra-domain, or inter-domain) multicast routing infrastructures. Only Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) is analyzed, in its three main operational modes: the traditional Any Source Multicast (ASM) model, Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) model, and the ASM model enhanced by the Embedded RP group-to-RP mapping mechanism. This memo also describes enhancements to the protocol operations to mitigate these threats.
Authors
Pekka Savola
Pekka Savola
Rami Lehtonen
David Meyer
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)