Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Thank for an easy one!
Nit: 1. Introduction After those registrations were done, there were still some unused values that can be used for other security groups, there were still some unused values. I think the last "there were still some unused values" should be deleted.
I think it would be useful to include explicit entries in the initial IANA table indicating those values which are currently unassigned (i.e., add a range for 101-109 and 116-127.) For this use in particular, where overstepping the bounds of the allocation would impinge on codes retained by Symantec, this seems even more important than typical.
I already appreciate that the Object Identifier Range was donated by Symantec, however, I wonder if "donated Symantec" needs to appear in the title...?