Skip to main content

SSH Support of ML-DSA
draft-sfluhrer-ssh-mldsa-04

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Scott Fluhrer
Last updated 2025-08-11
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-sfluhrer-ssh-mldsa-04
sshm                                                          S. Fluhrer
Internet-Draft                                             Cisco Systems
Intended status: Informational                            11 August 2025
Expires: 12 February 2026

                         SSH Support of ML-DSA
                      draft-sfluhrer-ssh-mldsa-04

Abstract

   This document describes the use of ML-DSA digital signatures in the
   Secure Shell (SSH) protocol.

About This Document

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   The latest revision of this draft can be found at
   https://sfluhrer.github.io/ssh-mldsa/draft-sfluhrer-ssh-mldsa.html.
   Status information for this document may be found at
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sfluhrer-ssh-mldsa/.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the Secure Shell
   Maintenance Security Area mailing list (mailto:ssh@ietf.org), which
   is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ssh/.
   Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssh/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/sfluhrer/ssh-mldsa.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 12 February 2026.

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Background on ML-DSA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Public Key Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Public Key Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Signature Format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  Verification Algorithm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   7.  SSHFP DNS Resource Records  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   9.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   10. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     10.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     10.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   A Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer (CRQC) could break
   traditional asymmetric cryptograph algorithms: e.g RSA, ECDSA; which
   are widely deployed authentication options of SSH.  NIST has recently
   published the postquantum digital signature algorithm ML-DSA
   [FIPS204].

   This document describes how to use this algorithm for authentication
   within SSH [RFC4251], as a replacement for the traditional signature
   algorithms (RSA, ECDSA).

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

1.1.  Background on ML-DSA

   ML-DSA (as specified in FIPS 204) is a signature algorithm that is
   believed to be secure against attackers who have a Quantum Computer
   available to them.  There are three strengths defined for it (with
   the parameter sets being known as ML-DSA-44, ML-DSA-65 and ML-DSA-
   87).  In addition, for each defined parameter set, there are two
   versions, the 'pure' version (where ML-DSA directly signs the
   message) and a 'prehashed' version (where ML-DSA signs a hash that
   was computed outside of ML-DSA).  For this protocol, we will always
   use the pure version.

   In addition, ML-DSA also has a 'context' input, which is a short
   string that is common to the sender and the recceiver.  It is
   intended to allow for domain separation between separate uses of the
   same public key.  This protocol always uses an empty (zero length)
   context.

   FIPS 204 also allows ML-DSA to be run in either determanistic or
   'hedged' mode (where randomness is applied to the signature
   operation).  We place no requirement on which is used; the
   implementation should select based on the quality of their random
   number source.

2.  Conventions and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

   The descriptions of key and signature formats use the notation
   introduced in [RFC4251], Section 3, and the string data type from
   [RFC4251], Section 5.  Identifiers and terminology from ML-DSA
   [FIPS204] are used throughout the document.

3.  Public Key Algorithms

   This document describes three public key algorithms for use with SSH,
   as per [RFC4253], Section 6.6, corresponding to the three parameter
   sets of ML-DSA.  The names of the algorithm are "ssh-mldsa-44", "ssh-
   mldsa-65" and "ssh-mldsa-87", to match the level 2, 3 and 5 parameter
   sets [FIPS204].  These algorithm only support signing and not
   encryption.

   The below table lists the public key sizes and the signature size (in
   bytes) for the three parameter sets.

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

     +===========================+=================+================+
     | Public Key Algorithm Name | Public Key Size | Signature Size |
     +===========================+=================+================+
     | ssh-mldsa-44              | 1312            | 2420           |
     +---------------------------+-----------------+----------------+
     | ssh-mldsa-65              | 1952            | 3309           |
     +---------------------------+-----------------+----------------+
     | ssh-mldsa-87              | 2592            | 4627           |
     +---------------------------+-----------------+----------------+

                                 Table 1

4.  Public Key Format

   The key format for all three parameter sets have the following
   encoding:

   string "ssh-mldsa-44" (or "ssh-mldsa-65" or "ssh-mldsa-87")

   string key

   Here, 'key' is the public key described in [FIPS204].

   # Signature Algorithm

   Signatures are generated according to the procedure in Section 5.2
   [FIPS204], using the "pure" version of ML-DSA, with an empty context
   string.

5.  Signature Format

   The "ssh-mldsa" key format has the following encoding:

   string "ssh-mldsa-44" (or "ssh-mldsa-65" or "ssh-mldsa-87")

   string signature

   Here, 'signature' is the signature produced in accordance with the
   previous section.

6.  Verification Algorithm

   Signatures are verified according to the procedure in [FIPS204],
   Section 5.3, using the "pure" version of ML-DSA, with an empty
   context strong.

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

7.  SSHFP DNS Resource Records

   Usage and generation of the SSHFP DNS resource record is described in
   [RFC4255].  This section illustrates the generation of SSHFP resource
   records for ML-DSA keys, and this document also specifies the
   corresponding code point to "SSHFP RR Types for public key
   algorithms" in the "DNS SSHFP Resource Record Parameters" IANA
   registry [IANA-SSHFP].

   The generation of SSHFP resource records keys for ML-DSA is described
   as follows.

   The encoding of ML-DSA public keys is described in [FIPS204].

   The SSHFP Resource Record for an ML-DSA key fingerprint (with a
   SHA-256 fingerprint) would, for example, be:

   pqserver.example.com.  IN SSHFP TBD 2 (
   a87f1b687ac0e57d2a081a2f28267237 34d90ed316d2b818ca9580ea384d9240 )

   Replace TBD with the value eventually allocated by IANA.

8.  IANA Considerations

   This document augments the Public Key Algorithm Names in [RFC4250],
   Section 4.11.3.

   IANA is requested to add the following entries to "Public Key
   Algorithm Names" in the "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters"
   registry [IANA-SSH]:

                 +===========================+===========+
                 | Public Key Algorithm Name | Reference |
                 +===========================+===========+
                 | ssh-mldsa-44              | THIS-RFC  |
                 +---------------------------+-----------+
                 | ssh-mldsa-65              | THIS-RFC  |
                 +---------------------------+-----------+
                 | ssh-mldsa-87              | THIS-RFC  |
                 +---------------------------+-----------+

                                  Table 2

   IANA is requested to add the following entries to "SSHFP RR Types for
   public key algorithms" in the "DNS SSHFP Resource Record Parameters"
   registry [IANA-SSHFP]:

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

                    +=======+=============+===========+
                    | Value | Description | Reference |
                    +=======+=============+===========+
                    | TBD1  | ML-DSA-44   | THIS RFC  |
                    +-------+-------------+-----------+
                    | TBD2  | ML-DSA-65   | THIS RFC  |
                    +-------+-------------+-----------+
                    | TBD3  | ML-DSA-87   | THIS RFC  |
                    +-------+-------------+-----------+

                                  Table 3

9.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations in [RFC4251], Section 9 apply to all SSH
   implementations, including those using ML-DSA.

   The security considerations in ML-DSA [FIPS204] apply to all uses of
   ML-DSA, including those in SSH.

   Cryptographic algorithms and parameters are usually broken or
   weakened over time.  Implementers and users need to continously re-
   evaluate that cryptographic algorithms continue to provide the
   expected level of security.

10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

   [FIPS204]  "Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard",
              NIST FIPS 204, August 2024,
              <https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

10.2.  Informative References

   [IANA-SSH] "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters", n.d.,
              <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters>.

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft                 SSH ML-DSA                    August 2025

   [IANA-SSHFP]
              "DNS SSHFP Resource Record Parameters", n.d.,
              <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sshfp-rr-
              parameters)>.

   [RFC4250]  Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4250, January 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4250>.

   [RFC4251]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, DOI 10.17487/RFC4251,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4251>.

   [RFC4253]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, DOI 10.17487/RFC4253,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4253>.

   [RFC4255]  Schlyter, J. and W. Griffin, "Using DNS to Securely
              Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints", RFC 4255,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4255, January 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4255>.

Acknowledgments

   The text of draft-josefsson-ssh-sphincs was used as a template for
   this document.

Author's Address

   Scott Fluhrer
   Cisco Systems
   Email: sfluhrer@cisco.com

Fluhrer                 Expires 12 February 2026                [Page 7]