DHCP configuration in MIF and associated IPR claim
draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Stjepan Gros , Leonardo Jelenkovic , Dejan Skvorc | ||
| Last updated | 2016-05-26 (Latest revision 2015-11-23) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
Abstract
The purpose of this draft is to analyze different options on how DHCP can be used to configure PvD aware client. This is done in light of IPR claim made by Huawei and the necessity to find an option for implementation. In order for an option to be selected it obviously must not interfere with IPR, or, IPR has to be somehow invalidated.
Authors
Stjepan Gros
Leonardo Jelenkovic
Dejan Skvorc
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)