%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection instead of this I-D.
@techreport{shawam-pwe3-ms-pw-protection-00,
	number =	{draft-shawam-pwe3-ms-pw-protection-00},
	type =		{Internet-Draft},
	institution =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	publisher =	{Internet Engineering Task Force},
	note =		{Work in Progress},
	url =		{https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-shawam-pwe3-ms-pw-protection-00},
        author =	{Huub van Helvoort and Loa Andersson and Andrew G. Malis and Jongyoon Shin and Lei Wang and Alessandro D'Alessandro},
	title =		{{Encapsulation for PSC for Multi-Segment Pseudowires}},
	pagetotal =	4,
	year =		,
	month =		,
	day =		,
	abstract =	{In RFC 6378 'MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection', as well as in the later updates of this RFC, the Protection State Coordiantion (PSC) protocol was defined for MPLS LSPs only. This draft extends RFC 6378 to be applicable for pseudowires as well.},
}