%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis instead of this I-D.
@techreport{shiomoto-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis-01,
    number =    {draft-shiomoto-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shiomoto-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis/01/},
    author =    {Kohei Shiomoto},
    title =     {{Advertisement of hierarchical and stitchable Label Switched Paths as Traffic Engineering Links}},
    pagetotal = 17,
    year =      2006,
    month =     mar,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {This document addresses topics related to hierarchical and stitched Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs). It describes extensions to allow an egress to identify that a bi-directional LSP will be used as a dynamically signaled Forwarding Adjacency LSP (FA-LSP) or Routing Adjacency (RA). In addition, the document also addresses the issue of how to indicate that an LSP should be advertised as a traffic engineering (TE) link into a different instance of the IGP and how to identify the instance that should be used.},
}