%% You should probably cite draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-05 instead of this revision.
@techreport{shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-04,
    number =    {draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey/04/},
    author =    {Shishio Tsuchiya and Seiichi Kawamura and Randy Bush and Cristel Pelsser},
    title =     {{Route Flap Damping Deployment Status Survey}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      2012,
    month =     mar,
    day =       12,
    abstract =  {BGP Route Flap Damping {[}RFC2439{]} is a mechanism that targets route stability. It penalyzes routes that flap with the aim of reducing CPU load on the routers. But it has side-effects. Thus, in 2006, RIPE recommended not to use Route Flap Damping (see {[}RIPE-378{]}). Now, some researchers propose to turn RFD, with less aggressive parameters, back on {[}draft-ymbk-rfd-usable{]}. This document describes results of a survey conducted amoung service provider on their use of BGP Route Flap Damping.},
}