%% You should probably cite draft-sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling-05 instead of this revision.
@techreport{sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling-03,
    number =    {draft-sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidrops-bgpsec-validation-signaling/03/},
    author =    {Oliver Borchert and Doug Montgomery and Daniel Kopp},
    title =     {{BGPsec Validation State Signaling}},
    pagetotal = 8,
    year =      2020,
    month =     jul,
    day =       28,
    abstract =  {This document defines a new BGP non-transitive extended community to carry the BGPsec path validation state. BGP speakers that receive this community string can use the embedded BGPsec validation state in conjunction with configured local policies to influence their decision process. The ability to accept and act on BGPsec path validation state from a neighbor allows for a reduction of path validation processing load and/or increased resilience in the event that a router is temporarily unable to perform local path validation.},
}