%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-sidrops-deprecate-rsync instead of this I-D. @techreport{sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync-00, number = {draft-sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidrops-bruijnzeels-deprecate-rsync/00/}, author = {Tim Bruijnzeels}, title = {{Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Repository Requirements}}, pagetotal = 6, year = 2019, month = nov, day = 4, abstract = {This document updates the profile for the structure of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) distributed repository {[}RFC6481{]} by describing how the RPKI Repository Delta Protocol (RRDP) {[}RFC8182{]} can be used, and stipulating that repositories which are made available over RRDP are no longer required to be available over rsync. The Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates {[}RFC6487{]} uses rsync URIs in the Authority Information Access, Subject Information Access, and CRL Distribution Points extensions. This document leaves this unchanged, meaning that rsync URIs are still used for naming and finding objects in the RPKI. However, it is no longer guaranteed that objects can be retrieved using these URIs.}, }