The Mailbox Update (MUPDATE) Distributed Mailbox Database Protocol
draft-siemborski-mupdate-04
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D) that has been submitted to the Independent Submission stream.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 3656.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Rob Siemborski | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2003-05-15) | ||
| RFC stream | Independent Submission | ||
| Intended RFC status | Experimental | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | ISE state | (None) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 3656 (Experimental) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Ned Freed | ||
| IESG note | |||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-siemborski-mupdate-04
Network Working Group Robert Siemborski
INTERNET-DRAFT Carnegie Mellon University
Intended Category: Experimental May, 2003
The MUPDATE Distributed Mailbox Database Protocol
<draft-siemborski-mupdate-04.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Task Force
(IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups
may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
As the demand for high-performance mail delivery agents increases,
it becomes apparent that single-machine solutions are inadequate to
the task, both because of capacity limits and that the failure of
the single machine means a loss of mail delivery for all users. It
is preferable to allow many machines to share the responsibility of
mail delivery.
The Mailbox Update (MUPDATE) protocol allows a group of IMAP (or
POP3) servers to function with a unified mailbox namespace. This
document is intended to serve as a reference guide to that protocol.
Please note that this specification is provided to give information
to the Internet community; it is anticipated that it would need to
be revised before widespread adaption.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 1]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
Table of Contents
1. Changes Since -03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Changes Since -02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Changes Since -01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Changes Since -00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. How to Read This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
7. Protocol Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.1. Atoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.2. Strings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. Server Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.1. Response: OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.2. Response: NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.3. Response: BAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.4. Response: BYES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.5. Response: RESERVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.6. Response: MAILBOX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.7. Response: DELETE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.8. Server Capability Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Client Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.1. Command: ACTIVATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.2. Command: AUTHENTICATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.3. Command: DEACTIVATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.4. Command: DELETE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.5. Command: FIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9.6. Command: LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.7. Command: LOGOUT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.8. Command: NOOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9.9. Command: RESERVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9.10. Command: STARTTLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9.11. Command: UPDATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
10. MUPDATE Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
11. MUPDATE URL Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
11.1. MUPDATE URL Scheme Registration Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
13. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
14. Intellectual Property Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
15. Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
16. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
17. Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
18. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 1]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
1. Changes Since -03 (RFC Editor: Remove Before Publication)
1. Correct registration of URL scheme to confirm with RFC2717.
2. Add maximums for line length, atom size, literal size, and
minimum time before an update is pushed to the client.
3. Add a minimum idle timeout.
4. Add IPR Boilerplate
2. Changes Since -02 (RFC Editor: Remove Before Publication)
1. Add STARTTLS Command
3. Changes Since -01 (RFC Editor: Remove Before Publication)
1. Add IANA considerations section requesting a TCP port number.
2. Split references into normative/informative.
4. Changes Since -00 (RFC Editor: Remove Before Publication)
1. Added required-to-implement SASL mechanism: GSSAPI.
2. Slight wording change in Server Initial Response section.
3. Allow untagged BAD responses.
5. How to Read This Document
The key words "MUST, "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
"RECOMMENDED", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as
defined in "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Lev-
els" [KEYWORDS]
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
server respectively.
6. Introduction
In order to support an architecture where there are multiple [IMAP]
servers sharing a common mailbox database, it is necessary to be
able to provide atomic mailbox operations, as well as offer suffi-
cient guarantees about database consistency.
The primary goal of the MUPDATE protocol is to be simple to imple-
ment yet allow for database consistency between participants.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 3]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
7. Protocol Overview
The MUPDATE protocol assumes a reliable data stream such as a TCP
network connection. This document requests that the IANA register a
TCP port number with the short name of "mupdate" for this purpose.
Current implementations are using port 2004.
In the current implementation of the MUPDATE protocol there are
three types of participants: a single master server, slave (or
replica) servers, and clients. The master server maintains an
authoritative copy of the mailbox database. Slave servers connect
to the MUPDATE master server as clients, and function as replicas
from the point of view of end clients. End clients may connect to
either the master or any slave and perform searches against the
database, however operations that change the database can only be
performed against the master. For the purposes of protocol discus-
sion we will consider a slave's connection to the master identical
to that of any other client.
After connection, all commands from a client to server must have an
associated unique tag which is an alphanumeric string. Commands MAY
be pipelined from the client to the server (that is, the client need
not wait for the response before sending the next command). The
server MUST execute the commands in the order they were received,
however.
If the server supports an inactivity login timeout, it MUST be
atleast 15 minutes.
MUPDATE uses data formats similar to those used in [ACAP]. That is,
atoms and strings. All commands and tags in the protocol are trans-
mitted as atoms. All other data is considered to a string, and must
be quoted or transmitted as a literal.
Outside of a literal, both clients and servers MUST support line
lengths of atleast 1024 octets (including the trailing CR and LF
characters). If a line of a longer length must be transmitted,
implementations MUST make use of literals to do so.
7.1. Atoms
An atom consists of one or more alphanumeric characters. Atoms MUST
be less than 15 octets in length.
7.2. Strings
As in [ACAP], a string may be either literal or a quoted string.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 4]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
A literal is a sequence of zero or more octets (including CR and
LF), prefix-quoted with an octet count in the form of an open brace
("{"), the number of octets, an optional plus sign to indicate that
the data follows immediately (a non-synchronized literal), a close
brace ("}"), and a CRLF sequence. If the plus sign is omitted (a
synchronized literal), then the receiving side MUST send a "+ go
ahead" response, and the sending side MUST wait for this response.
Servers MUST support literals of atleast 4096 octets.
Strings that are sent from server to client SHOULD NOT be in the
synchronized literal format.
A quoted string is a sequence of zero or more 7-bit characters,
excluding CR, LF, and the double quote (<">), with double quote
characters at each end.
The empty string is represented as either "" (a quoted string with
zero characters between double quotes) or as {0} followed by CRLF (a
literal with an octet count of 0).
8. Server Responses
Every client command in the MUPDATE protocol may receive one or more
tagged responses from the server. Each response is preceeded by the
same tag as the command that elicited the response from the server.
8.1. Response: OK
A tagged OK response indicates that the operation completed success-
fully. There is a mandatory implementation-defined string after the
OK response. This response also indicates the beginning of the
streaming update mode when given in response to an UPDATE command.
Example:
C: N01 NOOP
S: N01 OK "NOOP Complete"
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 5]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
8.2. Response: NO
A tagged NO response indicates that the operation was explicitly
denied by the server or otherwise failed. There is a mandatory
implementation-defined string after the NO response that SHOULD
explain the reason for denial.
Example:
C: A01 AUTHENTICATE "PLAIN"
S: A01 NO "PLAIN is not a supported SASL mechanism"
8.3. Response: BAD
A tagged BAD response indicates that the command from the client
could not be parsed or understood. There is a mandatory implementa-
tion-defined string after the BAD response to provide additional
information about the error. Note that untagged BAD responses are
allowed if it is unclear what the tag for a given command is (for
example, if a blank line is received by the mupdate server, it can
generate an untagged BAD response). In the case of an untagged
response, the tag should be replaced with a "*".
Example:
C: C01 SELECT "INBOX"
S: C01 BAD "This is not an IMAP server"
C:
S: * BAD "Need Command"
8.4. Response: BYE
A tagged BYE response indicates that the server has decided to close
the connection. There is a mandatory implementation-defined string
after the bad response that SHOULD explain the reason for closing
the connection. The server MUST close the connection immediately
after transmitting the BYE response.
Example:
C: L01 LOGOUT
S: L01 BYE "User Logged Out"
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 6]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
8.5. Response: RESERVE
A tagged RESERVE response may only be given in response to a FIND,
LIST, or UPDATE command. It includes two parameters: the name of
the mailbox that is being reserved (in mUTF-7 encoding, as specified
in [IMAP]) and a location string whose contents is defined by the
clients that are using the database, though it is RECOMMENDED that
the format of this string be the hostname of the server which is
storing the mailbox.
This response indicates that the given name is no longer available
in the namespace, though it does not indicate that the given mailbox
is available to clients at the current time.
Example:
S: U01 RESERVE "internet.bugtraq" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu"
8.6. Response: MAILBOX
A tagged MAILBOX response may only be given in response to a FIND,
LIST, or UPDATE command. It includes three parameters: the name of
the mailbox that is currently reserved, a location string (as with
RESERVE), and a client-defined string that specifies the IMAP ACL
[IMAP-ACL]of the mailbox. This message indicates that the given
mailbox is ready to be accessed by clients.
Example:
S: U01 MAILBOX "internet.bugtraq" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu" "anyone rls"
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 7]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
8.7. Response: DELETE
A tagged DELETE response may only be given in response to an UPDATE
command, and MUST NOT be given before the OK response to the UPDATE
command is given. It contains a single parameter, that of the mail-
box that should be deleted from the slave's database. This response
indicates that the given mailbox no longer exists in the namespace
of the database, and may be given for any mailbox name, active,
reserved, or nonexistent. (Though implementations SHOULD NOT issue
DELETE responses for nonexistent mailboxes).
Example:
S: U01 DELETE "user.rjs3.sent-mail-jan-2002"
8.8. Server Capability Response
Upon connection of the client to the server, and directly following
a successful STARTTLS command, the server MUST issue a capabilities
banner, of the following format:
The banner MUST contain a line that begins with "* AUTH" and contain
a space-separated list of SASL mechanisms that the server will
accept for authentication. The mechanism names are transmitted as
atoms. Servers MAY advertise no available mechanisms (to indicate
that STARTTLS must be completed before authentication may occur).
If STARTTLS is not supported by the server, then the line MUST con-
tain at least one mechanism.
If the banner is being issued without a TLS layer, and the server
supports the STARTTLS command, the banner MUST contain the line "*
STARTTLS". If the banner is being issued under a TLS layer (or the
server does not support STARTTLS), the banner MUST NOT contain this
line.
The last line of the banner MUST start with "* OK MUPDATE" and be
followed by four strings: the server's hostname, an implementation-
defined string giving the name of the implementation, an implementa-
tion-defined string giving the version of the implementation, and a
string that indicates if the server is a master or a slave. The
master/slave indication MUST be either "(master)" or an MUPDATE URL
that defines where the master can be contacted.
Any unrecognized responses before the "* OK MUPDATE" response MUST
be ignored by the client.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 8]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
Example:
S: * AUTH KERBEROS_V4 GSSAPI
S: * STARTTLS
S: * OK MUPDATE "mupdate.andrew.cmu.edu" "Cyrus" "v2.1.2" "(master)"
9. Client Commands
The following are valid commands that a client may send to the MUP-
DATE server: AUTHENTICATE, ACTIVATE, DEACTIVATE, DELETE, FIND, LIST,
LOGOUT, NOOP, RESERVE, STARTTLS, and UPDATE.
Before a successful AUTHENTICATE command has occurred, the server
MUST NOT accept any commands except for AUTHENTICATE, STARTTLS, and
LOGOUT (and SHOULD reply with a NO response for all other commands).
9.1. Command: ACTIVATE
The ACTIVATE command has 3 parameters: the mailbox name, its loca-
tion, and its ACL. This command MUST NOT not be issued to a slave
server.
This command can also be used to update the ACL or location informa-
tion of a mailbox. Note that it is not a requirement for a mailbox
to be reserved (or even exist in the database) for an ACTIVATE com-
mand to succeed, implementations MUST allow this behavior as it
facilitates synchronization of the database with the current state
of the mailboxes.
9.2. Command: AUTHENTICATE
The AUTHENTICATE command initiates a [SASL] negotiation session
between the client and the server. It has two parameters. The
first parameter is mandatory, and is a string indicating the desired
[SASL] mechanism. The second is a string containing an optional
BASE64 encoded (as defined in section 6.8 of [MIME]) client first
send.
All of the remaining SASL blobs that are sent MUST be sent across
the wire must be in BASE64 encoded format, and followed by a CR and
LF combination. They MUST NOT be encoded as strings.
Clients may cancel authentication by sending a * followed by a CR
and LF.
The [SASL] service name for the MUPDATE protocol is "mupdate".
Implementations are REQUIRED to implement the GSSAPI [SASL]
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 9]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
mechanism, though they SHOULD implement as many mechanisms as possi-
ble.
If a security layer is negotiated, it should be used directly fol-
lowing the CR and LF combination at the end of the server's OK
response. (i.e. beginning with the client's next command)
Only one successful AUTHENTICATE command may be issued per session.
9.3. Command: DEACTIVATE
The DEACTIVATE command takes two parameters, the mailbox name and
location data. The mailbox MUST already exist and be activated on
the MUPDATE server. If the server responds OK, then the mailbox
name has been moved to the RESERVE state. If the server responds
NO, then the mailbox name has not been moved (for example, the mail-
box was not already active). Any ACL information that is known
about the mailbox MAY be lost when a DEACTIVATE succeeds. This com-
mand MUST NOT be issued to a slave.
The typical sequence for mailbox creation is:
C: R01 ACTIVATE "user.rjs3.new" "mail3.andrew.cmu.edu!u4"
S: R01 OK "Mailbox Reserved."
C: A01 DEACTIVATE "user.rjs3.new" "mail3.andrew.cmu.edu!u4"
S: A01 OK "Mailbox Reserved."
9.4. Command: DELETE
The DELETE command takes only a single parameter, the mailbox name
to be removed from the database's namespace. The server SHOULD give
a NO response if the mailbox does not exist. This command MUST NOT
be issued to a slave server.
9.5. Command: FIND
The FIND command takes a single parameter, a mailbox name. The
server then responds with the current record for the given mailbox,
if any, and an OK response.
Example (mailbox does not exist):
C: F01 FIND "user.rjs3.xyzzy"
S: F01 OK "Search Complete"
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 10]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
Example (mailbox is reserved):
C: F01 FIND "user.rjs3"
S: F01 RESERVE "user.rjs3" "mail4.andrew.cmu.edu"
S: F01 OK "Search Complete"
9.6. Command: LIST
The LIST command is similar to running FIND across the entire
database. The LIST command takes a single optional parameter, which
is a prefix to try to match against the location field of the
records. Without the parameter, LIST returns every record in the
database.
For each mailbox that matches, either a MAILBOX or a RESERVE
response (as applicable) is sent to the client. When all responses
are complete, an OK response is issued.
Example:
C: L01 LIST
S: L01 RESERVE "user.rjs3" "mail4.andrew.cmu.edu!u2"
S: L01 MAILBOX "user.leg" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu!u1" "leg lrswipcda"
S: L01 OK "List Complete"
C: L02 LIST "mail4.andrew.cmu.edu!"
S: L02 RESERVE "user.rjs3" "mail4.andrew.cmu.edu!u2"
S: L02 OK "List Complete"
9.7. Command: LOGOUT
The LOGOUT command tells the server to close the connection. Its
only valid response is the BYE response. The LOGOUT command takes
no parameters.
9.8. Command: NOOP
The NOOP command takes no parameters. Provided the client is
authenticated, its only acceptable response is an OK. Any idle
timeouts that the server may have on the connection SHOULD be reset
upon receipt of this command.
If this command is issued after an UPDATE command has been issued,
then the OK response also indicates that all pending database
updates have been sent to the client. That is, the slave can guar-
antee that its local database is up to date as of a certain time by
issuing a NOOP and waiting for the OK. The OK MUST NOT return until
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 11]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
all updates that were pending at the time of the NOOP have been
sent.
9.9. Command: RESERVE
The RESERVE command takes two parameters (just like the RESERVE
response), the mailbox name to reserve and location data. If the
server responds OK, then the mailbox name has been reserved. If the
server responds NO, then the mailbox name has not been reserved (for
example, another server has reserved it already). This command MUST
NOT be issued to a slave.
The typical sequence for mailbox creation is:
C: R01 RESERVE "user.rjs3.new" "mail3.andrew.cmu.edu!u4"
S: R01 OK "Mailbox Reserved."
<client does local mailbox create operations>
C: A01 ACTIVATE "user.rjs3.new" "mail3.andrew.cmu.edu!u4" "rjs3 lrswipcda"
S: A01 OK "Mailbox Activated."
9.10. Command: STARTTLS
The STARTTLS command requests the commencement of a [TLS] negotia-
tion. The negotiation begins immediately after the CRLF in the OK
response. After a client issues a STARTTLS command, it MUST NOT
issue further commands until a server response is seen and the [TLS]
negotiation is complete.
The STARTTLS command is only valid in non-authenticated state. The
server remains in non-authenticated state, even if client creden-
tials are supplied during the [TLS] negotiation. The [SASL] EXTERNAL
mechanism MAY be used to authenticate once [TLS] client credentials
are successfully exchanged. Note that servers are not required to
support the EXTERNAL mechanism.
After the [TLS] layer is established, the server MUST re-issue the
initial response banner (see Section 7.8). This is necessary to pro-
tect against man-in-the-middle attacks which alter the capabilities
list prior to STARTTLS, as well as to advertise any new SASL mecha-
nisms (or other capabilities) that may be available under the layer.
The client MUST discard cached capability information and replace it
with the new information.
After the a successful STARTTLS command, the server SHOULD return a
NO response to additional STARTTLS commands.
Servers MAY choose to not implement STARTTLS. In this case, they
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 12]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
MUST NOT advertise STARTTLS in their capabilities banner, and SHOULD
return a BAD response to the STARTTLS command, if it is issued.
Example:
C: S01 STARTTLS
S: S01 OK "Begin TLS negotiation now"
<TLS negotiation, further commands are under TLS layer>
S: * AUTH KERBEROS_V4 GSSAPI PLAIN
S: * OK MUPDATE "mupdate.andrew.cmu.edu" "Cyrus" "v2.1.2" "(master)"
9.11. Command: UPDATE
The UPDATE command is how a slave initializes an update stream from
the master (though it is also valid to issue this command to a
slave). In response to the command, the server returns a list of
all mailboxes in its database (the same results as a parameterless
LIST command) followed by an OK response. From this point forward,
whenever an update occurs to the master database, it MUST stream the
update to the slave within 30 seconds. That is, it will send
RESERVE, MAILBOX, or DELETE responses as they are applicable.
After a client has issued an UPDATE command, it may only issue NOOP
and LOGOUT commands for the remainder of the session.
Example:
C: U01 UPDATE
S: U01 MAILBOX "user.leg" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu!u1" "leg lrswipcda"
S: U01 MAILBOX "user.rjs3" "mail3.andrew.cmu.edu!u4" "rjs3 lrswipcda"
S: U01 RESERVE "internet.bugtraq" "mail1.andrew.cmu.edu!u5" "anyone lrs"
S: U01 OK "Streaming Begins"
<some time goes by, and another client creates a new mailbox>
S: U01 RESERVE "user.leg.new" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu!u1"
<some more time passes, and the create succeeds>
S: U01 MAILBOX "user.leg.new" "mail2.andrew.cmu.edu!u1" "leg lrswipcda"
<much more time passes, and the slave decides to send a NOOP to reset its
inactivity timer>
C: N01 NOOP
S: U01 DELETE "user.leg.new"
S: N01 OK "NOOP Complete"
10. MUPDATE Formal Syntax
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [ABNF]. This uses the ABNF core
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 13]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
rules as specified in Appendix A of [ABNF].
Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-
insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to define
token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST
accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.
Note that this specification also uses some terminals from section 8
of [ACAP].
cmd-activate = "ACTIVATE" SP string SP string SP string
cmd-authenticate = "AUTHENTICATE" SP sasl-mech [ SP string ]
cmd-delete = "DELETE" SP string
cmd-find = "FIND" SP string
cmd-list = "LIST" [ SP string ]
cmd-logout = "LOGOUT"
cmd-noop = "NOOP"
cmd-reserve = "RESERVE" SP string SP string
cmd-starttls = "STARTTLS"
cmd-update = "UPDATE"
command = tag SP command-type CRLF
command-type = cmd-activate / cmd-authenticate / cmd-delete /
cmd-find / cmd-list / cmd-logout / cmd-noop /
cmd-reserve / cmd-starttls / cmd-update
response = tag SP response-type CRLF
response-type = rsp-ok / rsp-no / rsp-bad / rsp-bye / rsp-mailbox /
rsp-reserve / rsp-delete
rsp-bad = "BAD" SP string
rep-bye = "BYE" SP string
rsp-mailbox = "MAILBOX" SP string SP string SP string
rsp-no = "NO" SP string
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 14]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
rsp-ok = "OK" SP string
rsp-reserve = "RESERVE" SP string SP string
rsp-delete = "DELETE" SP string
sasl-mech = 1*ATOM-CHAR
; ATOM-CHAR is defined in [ACAP]
string = quoted / literal
; quoted and literal are defined in [ACAP]
tag = 1*ATOM-CHAR
; ATOM-CHAR is defined in [ACAP]
11. MUPDATE URL Scheme
This document defines the a URL scheme for the purposes of referenc-
ing MUPDATE resources, according to the requirements in [RFC2717].
This includes both MUPDATE servers as a whole, along with individual
mailbox entries on a given MUPDATE server.
There is no MIME type associated with these resources. It is
intended that a URL consumer would either retrieve the MUPDATE
record in question, or simply connect to the MUPDATE server running
on the specified host. Note that the consumer will need to have
authentication credentials for the specified host.
The MUPDATE URL scheme is similar to the IMAP URL scheme [IMAP-URL].
However, it only takes one of two possible forms:
mupdate://<iserver>/
mupdate://<iserver>/<mailbox>
The first form refers to a MUPDATE server as a whole, the second
form indicates both the server and a mailbox to run a FIND against
once authenticated to the server. Note that part of <iserver> may
include username and authentication information along with a host-
name and port.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 15]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
11.1. MUPDATE URL Scheme Registration Form
URL scheme name: "mupdate"
URL scheme syntax:
This defines the MUPDATE URL Scheme in [ABNF]. Terminals from
the BNF of IMAP URLs [IMAP-URL] are also used.
mupdateurl = "mupdate://" iserver "/" [ enc_mailbox ]
; iserver and enc_mailbox are as defined in [IMAP-URL]
Character encoding considerations:
Identical to those described in [IMAP-URL] for the appropriate
terminals.
Intended Usage:
The form of the URL without an associated mailbox is intended to
designate a MUPDATE server only. If a mailbox name is included
in the URL, then the consumer is expected to execute a FIND com-
mand for that mailbox on the specified server.
Applications and/or protocols which use this URL scheme name:
The protocol described in this document.
Interoperability Considerations:
None.
Security Considerations:
Users of the MUPDATE URL Scheme should review the security con-
siderations that are discussed in [IMAP-URL]. In particular,
the consequences of including authentication mechanism informa-
tion in a URL should be reviewed.
Relevant Publications:
This document and [IMAP-URL].
Author, Change Controller, and Contact for Further Information:
Author of this document.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 16]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
12. Security Considerations
While no unauthenticated users may make modifications or even per-
form searches on the database, it is important to note that this
specification assumes no protections of any type for authenticated
users.
All authenticated users have complete access to the database. For
this reason it is important to ensure that accounts that are making
use of the database are well secured.
A more secure deployment might have all read only access go through
a slave, and only have accounts which need write access use the mas-
ter. This has the disadvantage of a marginally longer time for
updates to reach the clients.
The protocol assumes that all authenticated users are cooperating to
maintain atomic operations. Therefore, all new mailboxes SHOULD be
RESERVEd before they are ACTIVATEd, despite the fact that the proto-
col does not require this, and it is therefore possible for a set of
participants which do not obey the provided locking to create an
inconsistent database. RESERVEing the mailbox first is not required
to perform an activate because this behavior simplifies synchroniza-
tion with the actual location of the mailboxes.
13. IANA Considerations
This document requests that the IANA provide a TCP port number with
the short name of "mupdate".
This document requests that the IANA register a URL scheme for the
MUPDATE protocol, as defined in section 11.1 of this document.
14. Intellectual Property Rights
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to per-
tain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances
of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made
to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such pro-
prietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 17]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
15. Copyright
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of devel-
oping Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights
defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as
required to translate it into languages other than English.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 18]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
16. References
The following documents contain normative definitions or specifications
that are necessary for correct understanding of this protocol:
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Require-
ment Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997
[IMAP] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol", RFC 2060,
December 1996.
[ABNF] Crocker, D., "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications:
ABNF", RFC 2234, November, 1997.
[MIME] Freed, N. & Bornstein, N., "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extentions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bod-
ies", RFC 2045, November 1996.
[IMAP-ACL] Myers, J., "IMAP4 ACL extention", RFC 2086, January 1997.
[SASL] Myers, J., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer
(SASL)", RFC 2222, October 1997.
[IMAP-URL] Newman, C., "IMAP URL Scheme", RFC 2192, September 1997.
[ACAP] Newman, C. & Myers, J., "ACAP -- Application Configuration
Access Protocol", RFC 2244, November 1997.
[TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.0", RFC
2246, January 1999.
The following references are for informational purposes only:
[POP3] Myers, J. & Rose, M., "Post Office Protocol - Version 3",
STD 53, RFC 1939, May 1996.
[RFC2717] Petke, R. and I. King, "Registration Procedures for URL
Scheme Names", RFC 2717, November 1999.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 19]
The MUPDATE Protocol May, 2003
17. Author's Address:
Robert Siemborski
Carnegie Mellon, Andrew Systems Group
Cyert Hall 207
5000 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
+1 412 268 7456
rjs3+@andrew.cmu.edu
18. Acknowledgments:
Lawrence Greenfield and Ken Murchison, for a great deal of input on
both the protocol and the text of the drafts.
Siemborski Expires November, 2003 [Page 20]