CoAP Communication with Alternative Transports
draft-silverajan-core-coap-alternative-transports-11

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-09-06 (latest revision 2018-03-05)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-silverajan-core-coap-alternative-transports-11.txt

Abstract

The aim of this document is to provide a way forward to best decide upon how alternative transport information can be expressed in a CoAP URI. This draft examines the requirements for a new URI format for representing CoAP resources over alternative transports. Various potential URI formats are presented. Benefits and drawbacks of embedding alternative transport information in various ways within the URI components are also discussed. From all listed formats, the document finds scheme-based model to be the most technically feasible.

Authors

Bill Silverajan (Bilhanan.Silverajan@tut.fi)
Teemu Savolainen (teemu.savolainen@nokia.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)