%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type instead of this I-D.
@techreport{sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-00,
    number =    {draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type/00/},
    author =    {Siva Sivabalan and Jan Medved and Ina Minei and Edward Crabbe},
    title =     {{LSP setup method in PCEP messages}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2013,
    month =     oct,
    day =       5,
    abstract =  {A path computation element can compute traffic engineering paths (TE paths) through a network that are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are label switched paths (LSPs) which are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to PCEP to allow support for different LSP setup methods over a single PCEP session.},
}