%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type instead of this I-D. @techreport{sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-01, number = {draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-01}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type/01/}, author = {Siva Sivabalan and Jan Medved and Ina Minei and Edward Crabbe}, title = {{Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages}}, pagetotal = 7, year = 2013, month = oct, day = 16, abstract = {A Path Computation Element can compute traffic engineering paths (TE paths) through a network that are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are label switched paths (LSPs) which are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to PCEP to allow support for different path setup methods over a given PCEP session.}, }