Skip to main content

A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Digital Nation Pakistan (DNP)
draft-sohail-urn-dnp-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Hira Sohail
Last updated 2026-08-10
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-sohail-urn-dnp-01
Independent Submission                                    H. Sohail, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                       PDA
Intended status: Informational                            10 August 2026
Expires: 11 February 2027

  A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Digital Nation Pakistan
                                 (DNP)
                        draft-sohail-urn-dnp-01

Abstract

   This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for
   persistent, location-independent identification of normative and
   authoritative publications issued under the Digital Nation Pakistan
   (DNP) programme by the Pakistan Digital Authority (PDA), a federal
   statutory body of the Government of Pakistan established under the
   Digital Nation Pakistan Act, 2025.  The namespace covers policies,
   frameworks, technical standards, reference architectures,
   specifications, schemas, application programming interface contracts,
   registries and datasets that PDA issues or is statutorily designated
   to maintain.  This document requests registration of the formal
   Namespace Identifier "dnp" in accordance with RFC 8141.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 11 February 2027.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.2.  What This Namespace Does Not Cover  . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   2.  URN Namespace Definition and Registration Template  . . . . .   4
   3.  Syntax  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.1.  Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.2.  The class Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.3.  The local-id Field  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     3.4.  The edition Field and the Work/Edition Distinction  . . .  10
     3.5.  URN-Equivalence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.6.  r-components, q-components and f-components . . . . . . .  12
     3.7.  Examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   4.  Assignment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     4.1.  Assignment Authority  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     4.2.  Uniqueness  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     4.3.  Persistence and Non-Reassignment  . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     4.4.  Institutional Continuity  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   5.  Security and Privacy  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     5.1.  Absence of Personal Data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     5.2.  Comparison and Confusion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
     5.3.  Authenticity and Spoofing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     5.4.  Resolver Operation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
   6.  Interoperability  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
   7.  Resolution  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   8.  Additional Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
   9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  19
   10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
   11. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
   12. Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
   Changes from draft-sohail-urn-dnp-00  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21

1.  Introduction

   The Pakistan Digital Authority (PDA) is a federal statutory body of
   the Government of Pakistan, established under the Digital Nation
   Pakistan Act, 2025 [DNPACT].  Its statutory functions include the
   specification of national standards for digital public
   infrastructure, the coordination of digitalisation across federal and
   provincial government entities, and the issuance of the National

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   Digital Masterplan and its constituent sectoral plans.

   In discharging those functions PDA issues a growing corpus of
   normative documents.  Instruments in this corpus are cited by federal
   and provincial government entities, by regulated private-sector
   participants in Pakistan's digital economy, by procurement and audit
   processes, by academic and policy researchers, and by international
   development partners.  Citations to these instruments are expected to
   remain resolvable and unambiguous over periods measured in decades.

   At present those instruments are cited by HTTP URI.  Experience in
   Pakistan and elsewhere shows that government HTTP URIs are not
   durable at that timescale: they change when hosting arrangements
   change, when content management systems are replaced, when
   organisational units are renamed or merged, and when domain naming
   conventions are revised.  Citations in printed statutory instruments,
   in signed contracts and in the published academic record cannot be
   revised when this happens.  The resulting reference decay degrades
   the evidentiary value of the corpus.

   A URN namespace addresses this by separating the identity of an
   instrument from its location.  This document defines such a
   namespace, specifies the syntax and assignment rules for names within
   it, and requests registration of the Namespace Identifier (NID) "dnp"
   as a formal URN namespace under [RFC8141].

1.1.  Terminology

   The terms "URN", "NID", "NSS", "assigned-name", "r-component",
   "q-component" and "f-component" are used as defined in [RFC8141].

   The following additional terms are used in this document:

   instrument:  A discrete normative or authoritative publication issued
      under the DNP programme, considered as a continuing intellectual
      work independent of any particular edition of it.

   edition:  A specific, fixed and immutable published state of an
      instrument, as approved and released on a particular date.

   the Register:  The authoritative record of names assigned within this
      URN namespace, maintained by PDA as described in Section 4.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

1.2.  What This Namespace Does Not Cover

   The scope of this namespace is deliberately narrower than the full
   range of Government of Pakistan publications.  In particular:

   *  Names in this namespace MUST NOT be assigned to primary
      legislation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.  Authority over
      the authoritative text of Acts of Parliament rests with organs of
      the State other than PDA.  The "lex" namespace [RFC9676] is the
      appropriate vehicle for legal norms and PDA does not seek to
      displace it.

   *  Names in this namespace MUST NOT be assigned to natural persons,
      to legal persons, to individual transactions, or to any resource
      whose representation contains personal data.  See Section 5.

   *  Operational records, case files, correspondence and internal
      working documents of PDA are outside scope.  The namespace
      identifies published instruments only.

2.  URN Namespace Definition and Registration Template

   The following registration template conforms to Appendix A of
   [RFC8141].  Sections 3 through 6 of this document expand on the
   Syntax, Assignment, Security and Privacy, and Resolution entries of
   the template and are normative for them.

   Namespace Identifier:
      dnp

   Version:
      1

   Date:
      2026-08-05

   Registrant:
      Pakistan Digital Authority (PDA)
      Government of Pakistan
      4th Floor, 5-A Constitution Avenue, Sector F-5/1
      Islamabad, Pakistan

      Designated contact: Hira Sohail, Director of Partnerships &
      Stakeholder Engagement
      Email: director-se@pda.gov.pk
      Telephone: +92 302 516 1211
      Web: https://pda.gov.pk/

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

      PDA is a federal statutory body established under the Digital
      Nation Pakistan Act, 2025 [DNPACT], with statutory responsibility
      for national digital standards.  PDA is not requesting the fast-
      track registration procedure described in Section 6.3 of
      [RFC8141]; this registration is submitted under the Expert Review
      procedure of Section 6.2.

   Purpose:
      Names in this namespace identify normative and authoritative
      instruments published under the Digital Nation Pakistan programme.
      The classes of instrument covered are enumerated in Section 3.2
      and include national digital policies, frameworks, technical
      standards, reference architectures, specifications, implementation
      guidelines, data schemas, application programming interface
      contracts, public registries, published datasets and formal
      directives issued by PDA.

      The primary community of use is the Government of Pakistan,
      comprising federal ministries and divisions, provincial
      governments and their attached departments and autonomous bodies,
      together with the private-sector entities that build on or must
      conform to Pakistan's digital public infrastructure.  Secondary
      communities of use include international standards bodies,
      multilateral development institutions with programmes in Pakistan,
      comparative policy researchers, the archival and library sector,
      and implementers in other jurisdictions who reference Pakistani
      specifications when designing interoperable systems.

      The Internet community at large benefits in three respects.
      First, the corpus is published openly and is of direct interest to
      the growing body of practice on digital public infrastructure, in
      which Pakistan is an adopter and a contributor; stable citation
      makes that corpus usable in the scholarly and technical record.
      Second, Pakistani specifications describe interfaces that non-
      Pakistani systems interoperate with, so unambiguous identification
      of a specific edition of a specification has direct engineering
      value beyond Pakistan.  Third, government publications are among
      the most frequent victims of reference decay, and a managed
      namespace with an explicit non-reassignment commitment reduces
      that decay for a corpus that would otherwise be cited by ordinary
      HTTP URI alone.

      This namespace complements rather than duplicates existing
      namespaces.  The "lex" namespace [RFC9676] identifies legal norms
      and is the appropriate identifier system for Pakistani
      legislation, which this namespace does not cover.  The "iso" and
      "ietf" namespaces identify the outputs of those bodies; where a
      DNP instrument profiles or adopts such an output it cites it in

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

      the native namespace rather than reassigning it.  Where an
      instrument is also assigned a Digital Object Identifier or, in
      future, a Pakistani National Bibliography Number, those
      assignments coexist with the URN and are recorded as equivalences
      in the Register; a single resource bearing more than one
      identifier is expressly contemplated by Section 5 of [RFC8141].

      Software that can make use of these names includes citation
      managers and reference-checking tools; document management and
      records systems within government; conformance and procurement
      tooling that must assert which edition of a standard a system was
      built against; long-term digital preservation systems in the
      national archival and library sector; and standards-registry
      software operated by PDA.  Resolution services are described in
      Section 7.

      Neither this namespace nor its definition is expected to become a
      constituent part of a standard developed in the IETF.  The
      namespace is expected to be referenced normatively by standards
      issued by PDA itself.

   Syntax:
      See Section 3.

   Assignment:
      See Section 4.

   Security and Privacy:
      See Section 5.

   Interoperability:
      See Section 6.

   Resolution:
      See Section 7.

   Documentation:
      This document.  A stable specification maintained by PDA is
      published at https://standards.dnp.gov.pk/ under the PDA document
      nomenclature framework and is kept synchronised with this
      registration.

   Additional Information:
      See Section 8.

   Revision Information:
      None.  This is the initial registration.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

3.  Syntax

3.1.  Formal Syntax

   Names in this namespace conform to the URN syntax of Section 2 of
   [RFC8141].  The Namespace Specific String (NSS) is further
   constrained as follows, using the Augmented Backus-Naur Form of
   [RFC5234].  The rules ALPHA and DIGIT are imported from [RFC5234].

     NSS         = class ":" local-id [ ":" edition ]

     class       = 2*24( ALPHA )

     local-id    = id-start *62( id-char ) id-end
     id-start    = ALPHA / DIGIT
     id-char     = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "."
     id-end      = ALPHA / DIGIT

     edition     = ver-form / date-form
     ver-form    = "v" 1*3DIGIT [ "." 1*3DIGIT ]
     date-form   = 4DIGIT "-" 2DIGIT "-" 2DIGIT

   The grammar above defines the set of well-formed names.  It is wider
   than the set of names PDA assigns: the assignment practice in
   Section 3.3 and the canonical form in Section 3.5 are narrower, and a
   name presented in a form the grammar admits but PDA would not have
   assigned is still well-formed and still URN-equivalent to the
   assigned name.

   The NSS contains at most two colon characters and consists of exactly
   two or three fields.  No structure is implied by the colon beyond the
   field division defined above; consistent with Section 5 of [RFC8141],
   the NSS is to be read as a whole and this section is the sole source
   of its internal structure.

   Every character permitted by the grammar above is a member of the
   "pchar" production of [RFC3986] and requires no percent-encoding.
   Names in this namespace therefore never contain percent-encoded
   octets.  A candidate name containing a percent character is malformed
   and MUST be rejected rather than decoded.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 7]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   Characters outside the ASCII range MUST NOT appear in names in this
   namespace.  PDA publishes in Urdu and in English and publishes titles
   and descriptive metadata in both; those titles are metadata carried
   in the Register and in resolution responses, and are not part of the
   identifier.  This restriction follows the recommendation in
   Section 2.2 of [RFC8141] that URN namespaces avoid non-ASCII
   characters unless the nature of the namespace makes them necessary,
   and it eliminates a class of homograph confusion described in
   Section 5.

3.2.  The class Field

   The class field states the kind of instrument identified.  The
   initial set of registered classes is:

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 8]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   +===============+==================================================+
   | class         | Kind of instrument                               |
   +===============+==================================================+
   | policy        | A national digital policy instrument approved    |
   |               | through the applicable governmental process      |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | framework     | A structuring instrument that organises a domain |
   |               | without itself imposing conformance requirements |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | standard      | A technical standard against which conformance   |
   |               | can be asserted and assessed                     |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | architecture  | A reference architecture                         |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | specification | A functional or technical specification for a    |
   |               | system, service or component                     |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | guideline     | Non-binding implementation guidance              |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | directive     | A formal instruction issued by PDA under its     |
   |               | statutory powers                                 |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | schema        | A data schema, vocabulary or code list           |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | api           | An application programming interface contract    |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | registry      | A public registry maintained by or on behalf of  |
   |               | PDA                                              |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | dataset       | A published dataset                              |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | masterplan    | The National Digital Masterplan and its          |
   |               | constituent sectoral plans                       |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
   | publication   | A report, study or other authoritative           |
   |               | publication not falling within another class     |
   +---------------+--------------------------------------------------+

                  Table 1: Initially Registered Classes

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027                [Page 9]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   The set of classes is closed at any given time and is extended only
   by amendment to the PDA specification referenced in the Documentation
   entry of Section 2.  A class, once registered, MUST NOT be withdrawn
   or redefined; a class that ceases to be used for new assignments is
   marked closed in the Register and the names already assigned within
   it remain valid.  Adding a class does not require revision of this
   URN namespace registration, because it does not alter the syntax, the
   assignment authority or the persistence commitment.  PDA publishes
   the current set of classes at the location given in the Documentation
   entry.

3.3.  The local-id Field

   The local-id field carries the identifier already assigned to the
   instrument under PDA's internal document nomenclature framework,
   transformed to lower case.  Where an instrument has no such
   identifier, local-id is a mnemonic assigned by PDA at the time of
   first publication.  In either case local-id is unique within its
   class and, once assigned, is never reassigned.

   local-id identifies the instrument as a continuing work.  It does
   not, and is not intended to, encode the subject matter, the issuing
   organisational unit, the publication date or the status of the
   instrument.  Consumers MUST NOT parse local-id for such information;
   that information is metadata and is obtained from the Register.

3.4.  The edition Field and the Work/Edition Distinction

   The optional edition field distinguishes two things that are
   deliberately identified separately, and understanding this
   distinction is necessary to using the namespace correctly.

   A name without an edition field identifies the instrument as a
   continuing work: the standard, the policy or the framework as an
   institutional object that persists across successive revisions.  Such
   a name is appropriate where the citing party means "this instrument,
   whichever edition is current" -- for example in a statutory
   instrument that requires conformance with a named standard as amended
   from time to time.

   A name with an edition field identifies one fixed, immutable
   published state of that instrument.  Such a name is appropriate where
   the citing party means "this exact text" -- for example in a
   conformance assertion, a procurement specification, a signed
   contract, or a scholarly citation.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 10]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   Both forms are permanent and neither is ever reassigned.  The work-
   level name continues to identify the same work even after every
   edition of it has been superseded, and continues to identify it after
   the work is withdrawn from current effect; withdrawal is a change of
   status recorded in the Register, not a change of identity.  An
   edition-level name continues to identify the same fixed text
   indefinitely, including after that text has been superseded.  Neither
   form is ever deleted from the Register.

   The two forms are distinct names identifying distinct resources and
   are not URN-equivalent to one another.  Resolution behaviour for each
   form is specified in Section 7.

   Two edition forms are provided.  The ver-form is used where the
   instrument carries an editorial version number, which is the normal
   case for standards and specifications.  The date-form, expressed as a
   calendar date in the Gregorian calendar in the format YYYY-MM-DD, is
   used where the instrument is identified by its date of issue rather
   than by a version number, which is the normal case for directives and
   for datasets published on a recurring cycle.  A given instrument uses
   one form or the other consistently throughout its life; the form in
   use for an instrument is recorded in the Register.

   Examples appear in Section 3.7.

3.5.  URN-Equivalence

   Two names in this namespace are URN-equivalent if they are URN-
   equivalent under the procedure in Section 3.1 of [RFC8141] after
   additionally applying ASCII case folding to the entire NSS.

   That is, in addition to the case-insensitivity of the "urn" scheme
   and of the NID that Section 3.1 already provides, the NSS in this
   namespace is case-insensitive.  The names

      urn:dnp:standard:dnp-d.002:v1

      urn:dnp:standard:DNP-D.002:v1

      URN:DNP:STANDARD:DNP-D.002:V1

   are URN-equivalent to one another.

   Because names in this namespace never contain percent-encoded octets
   (Section 3.1), the percent-encoding provisions of Section 3.1 of
   [RFC8141] have no effect here.  No further equivalence rules are
   defined.  In particular, hyphens and full stops within local-id are
   significant and are not elided for comparison purposes.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 11]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   This rule has the effect only of eliminating false negatives relative
   to the base procedure, as required by Section 3.1 of [RFC8141].  It
   does not cause any two names to be treated as distinct that the base
   procedure treats as URN-equivalent.

   PDA assigns names in lower case, and the lower-case form is
   canonical.  Applications SHOULD present names in the canonical form.

3.6.  r-components, q-components and f-components

   This namespace defines no r-component semantics.  Consistent with the
   guidance in Section 2.3.1 of [RFC8141], PDA does not use r-components
   and will not do so before their semantics are standardised.  A PDA
   resolver presented with an r-component MUST ignore it and resolve the
   assigned-name.

   This namespace defines no q-component semantics of its own.  Where a
   name resolves to a URI that is a locator, a q-component is handled as
   described in Section 2.3.2 of [RFC8141].  PDA resolution does not
   require q-component information and MUST NOT be designed to depend on
   it.

   f-components are interpreted per Section 2.3.3 of [RFC8141], that is,
   according to the media type of the retrieved representation.  Where
   PDA publishes an instrument in HTML, it SHOULD provide stable
   fragment identifiers corresponding to the numbered clauses of the
   instrument, so that a clause-level citation such as
   urn:dnp:standard:dnp-x.001:v2#clause-4.3 is durable.  Such fragment
   identifiers are a property of the published representation, not of
   the namespace, and are not taken into account for URN-equivalence.

3.7.  Examples

   The following illustrate the syntax.  They are not assignments.

      urn:dnp:standard:dnp-x.001 -- a nomenclature standard, as a
      continuing work

      urn:dnp:standard:dnp-x.001:v2 -- the second edition of that
      standard, as a fixed text

      urn:dnp:architecture:dnp-d.002:v1 -- the first edition of a
      reference architecture

      urn:dnp:masterplan:ndmp-2026-2035 -- the National Digital
      Masterplan as a work

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 12]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

      urn:dnp:masterplan:ndmp-2026-2035:v1 -- its first published
      edition

      urn:dnp:directive:pda-2026-014:2026-03-11 -- a directive
      identified by date of issue

      urn:dnp:schema:person-name:v1 -- the first edition of a data
      schema

      urn:dnp:api:consent:v2 -- the second edition of an API contract

      urn:dnp:dataset:connectivity-index:2026-06-30 -- a dataset edition
      published on a recurring cycle

4.  Assignment

4.1.  Assignment Authority

   Assignment within this namespace is closed.  Names are assigned
   solely by PDA, or by an entity acting under a written instrument of
   delegation issued by PDA.  Assignment is not open to application by
   third parties and there is no procedure by which an external party
   may request that a name be assigned to a resource of its own.

   Delegation is contemplated because instruments within scope may be
   issued by federal or provincial entities under PDA's coordinating
   mandate.  A delegation instrument specifies the classes and the
   local-id ranges within which the delegate may assign, and binds the
   delegate to the persistence commitment in Section 4.3.  Delegations
   in force are listed in the Register.  A delegation may be withdrawn;
   withdrawal has no effect on names already assigned under it, which
   remain valid and remain the responsibility of PDA.

4.2.  Uniqueness

   Uniqueness is enforced by construction.  PDA maintains a single
   authoritative Register of all assigned names.  A name is brought into
   existence only by an entry in the Register, and the Register rejects
   any entry whose assigned-name is URN-equivalent, under Section 3.5,
   to an existing entry.  Delegated assignment operates against the same
   Register and within non-overlapping allocations, so a delegate cannot
   create a collision with PDA or with another delegate.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 13]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   The Register records, for each name: the assigned-name; the
   instrument or edition identified; the date of assignment; the
   assigning entity; the current status; the current authoritative
   location or locations of the identified resource; a cryptographic
   digest of each edition-level resource as published; titles and
   descriptive metadata in English and Urdu; and any equivalent
   identifiers in other identifier systems.

4.3.  Persistence and Non-Reassignment

   A name assigned within this namespace MUST NOT be reassigned to a
   different resource, and MUST NOT be withdrawn or deleted, under any
   circumstance.  This holds where the identified instrument is
   superseded, repealed, withdrawn from effect, or found to have been
   issued in error; where the organisational unit that issued it is
   abolished or merged; and where the instrument is no longer published.
   In each case the fact is recorded as a status change in the Register
   and the name continues to identify what it has always identified.

   An error in an assignment is corrected by recording the error in the
   Register and, if necessary, assigning a new name.  It is never
   corrected by reusing the erroneous name.

4.4.  Institutional Continuity

   Section 5.1 of [RFC8141] asks that it be clear how a namespace
   remains viable if the assigning organisation can no longer maintain
   it.

   PDA is a body created by primary legislation rather than by
   administrative order, and its dissolution or reconstitution would
   require an act of the legislature.  Pakistani legislative practice on
   the reconstitution of statutory bodies provides for the devolution of
   the functions, assets and records of a dissolved body upon a
   successor or upon the Division concerned.  Stewardship of this
   namespace and of the Register is a function within the meaning of
   that practice, and would devolve accordingly.

   PDA additionally undertakes the following, which do not depend on
   PDA's continued existence:

   *  The Register is published in full as a machine-readable open
      dataset, refreshed on a regular cycle, so that a complete copy
      exists outside PDA's own systems at all times.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 14]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   *  PDA deposits the Register and the published corpus with Pakistan's
      national depository institutions and offers the same deposit to
      international web-archiving initiatives, so that the identifier-
      to-resource binding survives independently of PDA's
      infrastructure.

   *  If stewardship is transferred, PDA or its successor will submit a
      revised registration template under Section 6.2 of [RFC8141]
      recording the change.  Transfer of stewardship does not affect the
      validity of names already assigned.

5.  Security and Privacy

5.1.  Absence of Personal Data

   Names in this namespace are assigned only to published institutional
   instruments.  A name MUST NOT be assigned to a natural person, to an
   identifier of a natural person, to an individual transaction or
   record, or to any resource whose representation contains personal
   data.

   This constraint is stated normatively because PDA's statutory mandate
   includes national digital identity and data exchange infrastructure,
   and because the persistence properties that make URNs attractive for
   institutional documents make them actively harmful for identifiers of
   people.  A URN cannot be revoked, and the non-reassignment commitment
   in Section 4.3 is incompatible with any right of erasure.  Extending
   this namespace to cover personal or transactional data would require
   a new namespace registration with a materially different persistence
   model, and PDA does not propose one.

   The Register records the names of officers only in their
   institutional capacity, as the approving authority for an instrument,
   which is information already disclosed on the face of the published
   instrument.

5.2.  Comparison and Confusion

   The case-insensitivity rule in Section 3.5 introduces the general
   risks discussed in [RFC6943] for identifiers compared under case
   folding.  Those risks are bounded here: the NSS is restricted to
   ASCII letters, digits, hyphen and full stop, so ASCII case folding is
   locale-independent, involves no expansion or contraction of
   characters, and admits no Unicode confusables.  The Turkish dotless-i
   problem does not arise because folding is defined over the ASCII
   range only.  Implementations MUST perform case folding over the ASCII
   range only and MUST NOT apply locale-sensitive case mapping.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 15]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   A false positive in comparison could cause a system to treat a
   conformance assertion against one instrument as an assertion against
   another.  Because the identified resources are public and the
   Register is published, such an error is detectable by inspection.

   Because the work-level and edition-level forms of a name are similar
   in appearance but identify different resources (Section 3.4), an
   implementation that truncates or elides the edition field will
   silently substitute a work-level citation for an edition-level one.
   Where the citation appears in a conformance or contractual context
   this changes its meaning.  Implementations MUST NOT truncate names,
   and applications that display names SHOULD display them in full,
   consistent with Section 4.4 of [RFC8141].

5.3.  Authenticity and Spoofing

   A name in this namespace asserts nothing about the authenticity of
   any document it may be attached to.  A third party can place the
   string "urn:dnp:standard:..." on an unauthorised document as easily
   as it can place any other string.  The Register, retrieved over an
   authenticated channel, is the sole authority for what a name
   identifies; the cryptographic digests it records for edition-level
   resources allow a retrieved document to be checked against the
   published text.

   Consistent with Section 8 of [RFC8141], the information in this
   registration is a declaration and should be treated as advisory.

5.4.  Resolver Operation

   Where PDA operates a resolution service (Section 7), queries to that
   service reveal to PDA which instruments a given client is interested
   in, and, absent transport security, reveal the same to network
   observers.  Because the corpus includes policy and regulatory
   instruments, that interest may be sensitive; a pattern of queries
   could indicate the direction of an entity's compliance work or of a
   researcher's enquiry.

   Accordingly the PDA resolver MUST be offered over HTTPS, MUST NOT
   require authentication, and MUST NOT require or set cookies.  PDA
   retains resolver request logs only in aggregate form and only for
   capacity planning, and does not disclose individual query records.

   Directory harvesting is not a concern for this namespace: the
   Register is published in full and complete enumeration of the
   namespace is an intended feature rather than an attack.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 16]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

6.  Interoperability

   PDA is aware of the following potential sources of confusion and
   addresses each here rather than leaving it to be discovered later.

   *The string "DNP".* "DNP" is used as a corporate brand by at least
   one substantial commercial enterprise unconnected with Pakistan,
   which holds trademark registrations in that string in several
   jurisdictions and operates a brand top-level domain under it.  "DNP"
   is also an established abbreviation in chemistry and in professional
   sport.  PDA claims no association with any of these, and the
   registration of this NID neither asserts nor implies any right in the
   string outside the URN namespace registry.  PDA has selected the
   string because it is the statutory short form of Digital Nation
   Pakistan, the programme established by the Act of the same name, and
   not for any associative value.  PDA notes that a URN NID and a
   trademark occupy different registries with different scopes, that no
   resource identified in this namespace is a commercial good or
   service, and that Section 5.1 of [RFC8141] leaves disputes over
   strings to the parties concerned.  PDA will engage in good faith with
   any objection raised during Expert Review.

   *Legal norms.* The boundary with the "lex" namespace [RFC9676] is set
   out in Section 1.2.  Instruments in this namespace frequently cite
   Pakistani legislation; such citations use "lex" or the Gazette
   reference, not this namespace.  An instrument issued by PDA under a
   statutory power is identified here as a directive; the statutory
   power itself is not.

   *Bibliographic identifiers.* Pakistan has no registered National
   Bibliography Number sub-namespace under [RFC8458] at the time of
   writing.  Should the national library register one and assign numbers
   to instruments in this corpus, the resulting names would coexist with
   names in this namespace and be recorded as equivalences in the
   Register.  The same applies to Digital Object Identifiers, which PDA
   assigns to some publications through a DOI registration agency.

   *Internal document codes.* PDA's internal document nomenclature codes
   appear within local-id in transformed form (Section 3.3).  Those
   codes exist and circulate outside the URN context, and readers may
   encounter a code in isolation.  A bare code is not a URN and MUST NOT
   be treated as one; the transformation from code to local-id is
   defined in the PDA specification referenced in the Documentation
   entry of Section 2.  The transformation is not in general reversible
   by inspection and implementations MUST NOT attempt to reverse it
   algorithmically.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 17]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   *Character handling.* Because names never contain percent-encoded
   octets or non-ASCII characters (Section 3.1), the encoding pitfalls
   that arise when pre-existing identifier systems are mapped into URN
   syntax do not arise here.

   *Protocol slots.* Consistent with Section 4.1 of [RFC8141], a name in
   this namespace is not a locator and SHOULD NOT be placed in a URI
   protocol slot whose defined semantics require dereferencing to a
   representation.  It is appropriate in citation fields, metadata
   records, conformance declarations and provenance assertions.

7.  Resolution

   Resolution is intended.  PDA operates and undertakes to continue to
   operate a resolution service for names in this namespace.

   The service is offered over HTTPS at the endpoint
   https://urn.dnp.gov.pk/, operated by PDA under a Government of
   Pakistan domain.  A client resolves a name by requesting the
   assigned-name as a path component of that endpoint, for example
   https://urn.dnp.gov.pk/urn:dnp:standard:dnp-x.001:v2.  The endpoint
   is also recorded in the PDA specification referenced in the
   Documentation entry of Section 2; should it ever change, the
   specification and this registration are revised, and names already
   assigned are unaffected.

   Resolution behaviour follows the work/edition distinction of
   Section 3.4:

   *  A work-level name resolves to the current authoritative edition of
      the instrument where one is in force, and otherwise to a record
      describing the instrument and its editions.

   *  An edition-level name resolves to that fixed edition, and
      continues to do so after it has been superseded.  A superseded
      edition remains retrievable and is marked as superseded, with a
      reference to the edition that superseded it.  PDA does not remove
      superseded editions from publication.

   A client that requests a representation of the identified resource
   receives it, or a redirection to its current location.  A client that
   requests metadata, by content negotiation, receives the Register
   record for the name, including status, provenance, digests and
   equivalent identifiers.  Resolution of a syntactically valid name
   that has not been assigned is distinguishable from resolution of a
   name that has been assigned to an instrument that is no longer in
   force; the two are different conditions and are reported differently.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 18]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   Resolution is a convenience and is not constitutive.  A name remains
   valid, and continues to identify what the Register says it
   identifies, irrespective of whether any resolver is reachable, and
   irrespective of whether the identified resource is currently
   retrievable.

   PDA does not at present operate a registration process for third-
   party publicly advertised resolution services for this namespace, and
   does not at present recommend any resolver other than its own.
   Should PDA establish such a process, the requirements for being
   publicly advertised will be published alongside the specification
   referenced in the Documentation entry, and this registration will be
   revised.  Handling of r-components is specified in Section 3.6: PDA
   defines none, and its resolver ignores any that are presented.

8.  Additional Information

   The Digital Nation Pakistan Act, 2025 [DNPACT] establishes PDA and
   sets out its functions, including the specification of national
   digital standards and the coordination of digitalisation across
   government.  The Act is the source of PDA's authority to issue the
   instruments identified in this namespace and of the institutional
   continuity described in Section 4.4.

   Registrations by national government bodies in this registry include
   those of the Federal Chancellery of the Republic of Austria and of
   New Zealand [RFC4350], and by national memory institutions including
   the National Archives of Finland.  This registration follows the same
   pattern: a national public authority seeking durable identification
   of a defined corpus of official material, without any claim to a
   country-code-derived namespace.  PDA notes that Section 5.1 of
   [RFC8141] reserves strings of the form ALPHA ALPHA "-" for possible
   future country-code-based registration; this registration does not
   use, anticipate or depend on any such reservation.

9.  IANA Considerations

   This document requests that IANA register the formal URN Namespace
   Identifier "dnp" in the "Formal URN Namespaces" registry, using the
   registration template in Section 2, in accordance with Section 6.2 of
   [RFC8141].

   This document makes no other request of IANA.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 19]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

10.  Security Considerations

   Security and privacy considerations for this namespace are set out in
   Section 5, in accordance with Section 6.4.4 of [RFC8141].  General
   security considerations for URN namespaces are given in Section 8 of
   [RFC8141].

11.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.

   [RFC8141]  Saint-Andre, P. and J. Klensin, "Uniform Resource Names
              (URNs)", RFC 8141, DOI 10.17487/RFC8141, April 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8141>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

12.  Informative References

   [RFC4350]  Hendrikx, F. and C. Wallis, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN)
              Formal Namespace for the New Zealand Government",
              RFC 4350, DOI 10.17487/RFC4350, February 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4350>.

   [RFC6943]  Thaler, D., Ed., "Issues in Identifier Comparison for
              Security Purposes", RFC 6943, DOI 10.17487/RFC6943, May
              2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6943>.

   [RFC8458]  Hakala, J., "Using National Bibliography Numbers as
              Uniform Resource Names", RFC 8458, DOI 10.17487/RFC8458,
              October 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8458>.

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 20]
Internet-Draft            URN Namespace for DNP              August 2026

   [RFC9676]  Spinosa, P.L., Francesconi, E., and C. Lupo, "A Uniform
              Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Sources of Law (LEX)",
              RFC 9676, DOI 10.17487/RFC9676, May 2025,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9676>.

   [DNPACT]   Government of Pakistan, "The Digital Nation Pakistan Act,
              2025 (Act No. IV of 2025)", The Gazette of Pakistan,
              Extraordinary, Part I, 29 January 2025, January 2025,
              <https://na.gov.pk/>.

Changes from draft-sohail-urn-dnp-00

   The "class" production in Section 3.1 was changed from 2*24( lowalpha
   ) to 2*24( ALPHA ), and the now-unused "lowalpha" production was
   removed.  As drafted in -00, the grammar restricted the class field
   to lower-case letters while Section 3.5 declared the whole NSS case-
   insensitive and gave an all-upper-case name as an example of an
   equivalent form.  The two provisions were inconsistent, and on the
   strict reading the example was not a well-formed name.  The change
   resolves the inconsistency in favour of the equivalence rule.  It
   does not alter which names are URN-equivalent to which, and it does
   not alter PDA's practice of assigning in lower case.  Thanks to Dale
   R.  Worley for identifying this.

   A paragraph was added to Section 3.1 noting that the grammar defines
   well-formedness and is deliberately wider than PDA's assignment
   practice.

   This section is to be removed before any publication.

Author's Address

   Hira Sohail (editor)
   Pakistan Digital Authority
   4th Floor, 5-A Constitution Avenue
   Sector F-5/1, Islamabad
   Pakistan
   Phone: +92 302 516 1211
   Email: director-se@pda.gov.pk
   URI:   https://pda.gov.pk/

Sohail                  Expires 11 February 2027               [Page 21]