%% You should probably cite draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-15 instead of this revision.
@techreport{song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-13,
    number =    {draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-13},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry/13/},
        author =    {Haoyu Song and Greg Mirsky and Clarence Filsfils and Ahmed Abdelsalam and Tianran Zhou and Zhenbin Li and Thomas Graf and Gyan Mishra and Jongyoon Shin and Kyungtae Lee},
    title =     {{Marking-based Direct Export for On-path Telemetry}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {The document describes a packet-marking variation of the IOAM DEX option, referred to as PBT-M (i.e., Postcard-Based Telemetry by Marking). Similar to IOAM DEX, PBT-M does not carry the telemetry data in user packets but send the telemetry data through a dedicated packet. Unlike IOAM DEX, PBT-M does not require an extra instruction header. However, PBT-M raises some unique issues that need to be considered. This document formally describes the high level scheme and cover the common requirements and issues when applying PBT-M in different networks. PBT-M is complementary to the other on-path telemetry schemes such as IOAM trace and E2E options.},
}