Options for MPLS Extension Header Indicator
draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Haoyu Song , Zhenbin Li , Tianran Zhou , Loa Andersson | ||
| Last updated | 2022-01-03 (Latest revision 2021-07-02) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-03.txt
Abstract
The intention of this document is to enumerate and describe the candidate schemes that can be used to indicate the presence of the MPLS extension header(s) following the MPLS label stack. After a careful evaluation of these options by comparing their pros and cons, it is expected that one should be chosen as the final standard scheme for MPLS extension header indicator.
Authors
Haoyu Song
Zhenbin Li
Tianran Zhou
Loa Andersson
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)