Options for MPLS Extension Header Indicator
draft-song-mpls-eh-indicator-06
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Haoyu Song , Zhenbin Li , Tianran Zhou , Loa Andersson | ||
Last updated | 2023-07-01 (Latest revision 2022-12-28) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document enumerates and describes the candidate schemes that can be used to indicate the presence of the MPLS extension header(s) following the MPLS label stack. The similar schemes are also applicable for indicating the potential in-stack extensions. After a careful evaluation of these options by comparing their pros and cons, it is expected that one should be chosen as the final standard scheme for MPLS extension indicator.
Authors
Haoyu Song
Zhenbin Li
Tianran Zhou
Loa Andersson
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)