%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-sidrops-cms-signing-time instead of this I-D.
@techreport{spaghetti-sidrops-cms-signing-time-01,
    number =    {draft-spaghetti-sidrops-cms-signing-time-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-sidrops-cms-signing-time/01/},
    author =    {Job Snijders and Tom Harrison},
    title =     {{On the use of the CMS signing-time attribute in RPKI Signed Objects}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2023,
    month =     jun,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {RFC 6488 standardized a template for specifying Signed Objects that can be validated using the RPKI. Since the publication of that document, a new additional protocol for distribution of RPKI repositories was developed (RFC 8182), and new insights arose with respect to querying and combining the different distribution mechanisms. This document describes how Publishers and Relying Parties can use the CMS signing-time attribute to optimize seamless transitions from RRDP to RSYNC. Additionally, this document updates RFC 6488 by mandating the presence of the CMS signing-time attribute and disallowing the binary-signing-time attribute.},
}