Tracking Reviews of Documents
draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03

-- 3, bullet starting with "Reviewers must be able to indicate they are transitioning..."

Is this different than a "soft hiatus" followed by a "hard hiatus"?

This draft is really clear. I haven't been on a review team since 2010, but it sure looks good from the outside.

Just a couple of nits and minor thoughts ...

"all the of documents" is probably "all of the documents".

In this text,

   o  The tool must make it easy for the secretary to see the result of
      previous reviews from this team for a given document.  In Secdir,
      for example, if the request is for a revision that has only minor
      differences, and the previous review result was "Ready", a new
      assignment will not be made.
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I would have parsed this more easily if the text had been "the secretary will not make a new assignment". Darned past tense.

In this text,

   o  A secretary must be able to configure the tool to remind them to
      followup when actions are due.  (For instance, a secretary could
      receive email when a review is about to become overdue).
      
I've never been a secretary, but is it obvious whether this would be per-secretary or per-document (possibly inherited from a per-secretary setting)? If this was a calendar, there would be a default alert interval, but I'd be able to say "remind me again on Tuesday". Is that relevant here?

Thank you for capturing Appendix B.  Suggested features deferred for future work. That stuff would likely be great, but not worth holding everything else up for.

The shepherd write-up says Brian C's comments have still
to be handled - is that still true? I guess they have been
handled, given the dates.