LMAP Protocol Selection Criteria
draft-starkcarey-lmap-protocol-criteria-01
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Barbara Stark , Tim Carey | ||
Last updated | 2015-09-02 (Latest revision 2015-03-01) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft identifies criteria to be used by the LMAP WG in evaluating and selecting Control and Reporting Protocols described by [I-D.ietf-lmap-framework] and identified as WG deliverables in the LMAP charter. It is not intended for use for any other purpose or by any other party. This draft will not be maintained after LMAP completes its selection of these protocols. The authors of this draft do not intend to ask for working group adoption or formal publication by IETF.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)