Analysis of the Usage of ENUM and ENUM Services
draft-stastny-enum-services-analysis-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Stastny , Rudolf Brandner , Lawrence W. Conroy | ||
| Last updated | 2002-06-07 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document analyzes the usage of the URI-schemes, services and 'enumservices' under discussion for the ENUM System. It tries to combine the existing proposals for 'enumservices' and proposes examples of a compatible approach as a way forward for the definition of the 'enumservices' to be used in the ENUM trials planned.
Authors
Richard Stastny
Rudolf Brandner
Lawrence W. Conroy
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)