Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Network Address Translation Support
draft-stewart-natsupp-tsvwg-01
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Randall R. Stewart , Michael Tüxen , Irene Ruengeler | ||
Last updated | 2010-06-29 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Stream Control Transmission Protocol [RFC4960] provides a reliable communications channel between two end-hosts in many ways similar to TCP [RFC0793]. With the widespread deployment of Network Address Translators (NAT), specialized code has been added to NAT for TCP that allows multiple hosts to reside behind a NAT and yet use only a single globally unique IPv4 address, even when two hosts (behind a NAT) choose the same port numbers for their connection. This additional code is sometimes classified as Network Address and Port Translation or NAPT. To date, specialized code for SCTP has NOT yet been added to most NATs so that only pure NAT is available. The end result of this is that only one SCTP capable host can be behind a NAT. This document describes an SCTP specific chunks and procedures to help NAT's provide similar features of NAPT in the single point and multi-point traversal scenario.
Authors
Randall R. Stewart
Michael Tüxen
Irene Ruengeler
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)